howmanygpus.ai

Best LLMs to run on RTX 5090 32GB

consumer 32 GB GDDR7 · 1792 GB/s · 209 TFLOPS BF16 · updated 2026-10-23

Headline answer

Of 141 models in our catalog, 76 fit on a single RTX 5090 32GB at FP8, 93 at 4-bit (AWQ) and 58 at BF16 (8K context, batch 1). Largest that fits: Mistral Nemo 12B at BF16; Devstral 24B at FP8; Kimi Linear 48B-A3B at 4-bit (AWQ). Rental: $0.80/hr catalog estimate.

Change context, concurrency or framework in the calculator → RTX 5090 32GB full specs

Every model on RTX 5090 32GB

Fit band and share of VRAM per precision; N× GPUs = minimum count inside one node (tensor parallel); — = does not fit within one 8-GPU node. Speed and $/1M tokens for the highest-quality precision that fits on one GPU (BF16, else FP8, else 4-bit), single stream.

Model Params BF16FP84-bit (AWQ) tok/s $ / 1M tok
Kimi Linear 48B-A3B 48.0B (3.0B active) ——tight 95% 226 4-bit $1.46
Mixtral 8x7B 46.7B (12.9B active) ——tight 93% 110 4-bit $3.01
Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 35.0B (3.0B active) ——good 76% 224 4-bit $1.47
CodeLlama 34B 34.0B ——good 76% 53 4-bit $6.26
Yi-1.5 34B 4K ctx 34.0B ——good 75% 53 4-bit $6.27
DeepSeek R1 Distill 32B 32.0B ——good 79% 55 4-bit $5.98
Nemotron-Terminal-32B 32.0B ——good 79% 55 4-bit $5.98
OLMo-2 32B 4K ctx 32.0B ——good 73% 55 4-bit $5.98
Qwen 2.5 32B 32.0B ——good 79% 55 4-bit $5.98
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B 32.0B ——good 79% 55 4-bit $5.98
Qwen3 32B 32.0B ——good 79% 55 4-bit $5.98
Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B 31.6B (3.2B active) ——optimal 68% 223 4-bit $1.49
Muse Glimmer 30B 30.0B ——good 72% 59 4-bit $5.61
Qwen3 30B-A3B 30.0B (3.0B active) ——optimal 67% 224 4-bit $1.48
Gemma 2 27B 27.0B ——good 77% 63 4-bit $5.23
Gemma 3 27B 27.0B ——tight 83% 63 4-bit $5.26
Qwen3.6 27B 27.0B ——good 75% 64 4-bit $5.21
Devstral 24B 24.0B —tight 93%optimal 62% 39 FP8 $8.41
Devstral Small 2 24B 24.0B —tight 93%optimal 62% 39 FP8 $8.41
Magistral Small 24B 24.0B —tight 93%optimal 62% 39 FP8 $8.41
Mistral Small 3.1 24B 24.0B —tight 93%optimal 62% 39 FP8 $8.41
Codestral 22B 22.0B —tight 89%optimal 56% 42 FP8 $7.81
GPT OSS 20B 21.0B (3.6B active) —tight 81%optimal 54% 157 FP8 $2.11
InternLM 2.5 20B 20.0B —tight 82%optimal 56% 46 FP8 $7.19
DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite 16.0B (2.4B active) —optimal 64%optimal 42% 190 FP8 $1.74
StarCoder2 15B 16.0B —optimal 66%optimal 44% 56 FP8 $5.91
DeepSeek R1 Distill 14B 14.8B —optimal 65%optimal 49% 59 FP8 $5.57
Qwen 2.5 14B 14.8B —optimal 65%optimal 49% 59 FP8 $5.57
Qwen3 14B 14.8B —optimal 64%optimal 48% 59 FP8 $5.57
Phi 3 Medium 14.0B —optimal 63%optimal 42% 62 FP8 $5.34
Phi-4 14B 14.0B —optimal 63%optimal 46% 62 FP8 $5.34
Qwen 2.5 Coder 14B 14.0B —optimal 62%optimal 48% 62 FP8 $5.34
OLMo-2 13B 4K ctx 13.7B —optimal 67%optimal 50% 61 FP8 $5.40
LLaMA 2 13B 4K ctx 13.0B —optimal 65%optimal 46% 64 FP8 $5.18
Gemma 3 12B 12.0B —optimal 61%optimal 52% 69 FP8 $4.78
Mistral Nemo 12B 12.0B tight 92%optimal 55%optimal 43% 39 BF16 $8.41
Nemotron-Nano-12B-v2 12.0B tight 94%optimal 58%optimal 45% 39 BF16 $8.43
StableLM 2 12B 4K ctx 12.0B tight 90%optimal 54%optimal 40% 39 BF16 $8.41
Falcon3 10B 10.0B good 79%optimal 49%optimal 37% 46 BF16 $7.19
GLM-4 9B 9.0B good 70%optimal 42%optimal 34% 51 BF16 $6.53
Gemma 2 9B 9.0B good 78%optimal 50%optimal 45% 50 BF16 $6.61
Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 9.0B good 75%optimal 47%optimal 39% 50 BF16 $6.58
Yi-1.5 9B 4K ctx 9.0B good 70%optimal 43%optimal 31% 50 BF16 $6.55
InternLM3 8B 8.8B optimal 69%optimal 42%optimal 33% 52 BF16 $6.42
Qwen3-VL 8B 8.8B good 71%optimal 44%optimal 36% 52 BF16 $6.42
MiniCPM-V 4.5 8.7B good 71%optimal 44%optimal 36% 52 BF16 $6.38
Ministral-3 8B 8.5B optimal 69%optimal 43%optimal 35% 53 BF16 $6.25
Qwen2.5-VL 7B 8.3B optimal 66%optimal 41%optimal 33% 54 BF16 $6.11
DeepSeek R1 Distill 8B 8.0B optimal 66%optimal 42%optimal 34% 56 BF16 $5.95
Granite 3.3 8B 8.0B optimal 67%optimal 42%optimal 32% 56 BF16 $5.95
LLaMA 3.1 8B 8.0B optimal 66%optimal 42%optimal 34% 56 BF16 $5.95
Ministral 8B 8.0B optimal 66%optimal 42%optimal 34% 56 BF16 $5.95
Qwen3 8B 8.0B optimal 66%optimal 42%optimal 35% 56 BF16 $5.95
Qwen 2.5 7B 7.6B optimal 62%optimal 38%optimal 32% 58 BF16 $5.69
Falcon3 7B 7.5B optimal 62%optimal 39%optimal 32% 59 BF16 $5.60
Phi-3 Small 7B 7.4B optimal 62%optimal 40%optimal 32% 59 BF16 $5.56
InternLM 2.5 7B 7.0B optimal 60%optimal 38%optimal 31% 62 BF16 $5.32
LLaMA 2 7B 4K ctx 7.0B optimal 63%optimal 42%optimal 32% 61 BF16 $5.42
Mistral 7B 7.0B optimal 60%optimal 38%optimal 29% 62 BF16 $5.32
OLMo-2 7B 4K ctx 7.0B optimal 63%optimal 42%optimal 35% 61 BF16 $5.42
Qwen 2 7B 7.0B optimal 58%optimal 36%optimal 31% 62 BF16 $5.31
Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B 7.0B optimal 58%optimal 36%optimal 31% 62 BF16 $5.31
StarCoder2 7B 7.0B optimal 58%optimal 37%optimal 28% 62 BF16 $5.31
Yi-1.5 6B 4K ctx 6.0B optimal 51%optimal 33%optimal 26% 70 BF16 $4.70
Qwen3-VL 4B 4.4B optimal 44%optimal 31%optimal 27% 88 BF16 $3.76
Gemma 3 4B 4.3B optimal 43%optimal 30%optimal 30% 90 BF16 $3.67
Nemotron-Mini-4B 4K ctx 4.0B optimal 39%optimal 27%optimal 28% 95 BF16 $3.48
Qwen3 4B 4.0B optimal 42%optimal 29%optimal 27% 95 BF16 $3.49
Ministral 3B 3.8B optimal 38%optimal 27%optimal 25% 99 BF16 $3.35
Phi 3.5 Mini 3.8B optimal 46%optimal 35%optimal 30% 97 BF16 $3.42
Phi-4 Mini 3.8B optimal 40%optimal 28%optimal 28% 98 BF16 $3.36
Qwen2.5-VL 3B 3.8B optimal 37%optimal 26%optimal 23% 100 BF16 $3.31
Ministral-3 3B 3.4B optimal 37%optimal 26%optimal 25% 106 BF16 $3.11
LLaMA 3.2 3B 3.2B optimal 36%optimal 26%optimal 24% 110 BF16 $2.99
Falcon3 3B 3.0B optimal 34%optimal 25%optimal 24% 116 BF16 $2.86
Qwen 2.5 3B 3.0B optimal 32%optimal 23%optimal 21% 116 BF16 $2.84
Qwen 2.5 Coder 3B 3.0B optimal 32%optimal 23%optimal 21% 116 BF16 $2.84
StarCoder2 3B 3.0B optimal 32%optimal 23%optimal 20% 116 BF16 $2.84
Qwen3-VL 2B 2.1B optimal 29%optimal 22%optimal 22% 142 BF16 $2.33
Granite 3.1 2B 2.0B optimal 27%optimal 21%optimal 19% 148 BF16 $2.24
Qwen3 1.7B 1.7B optimal 26%optimal 21%optimal 21% 160 BF16 $2.06
SmolLM2 1.7B 1.7B optimal 28%optimal 23%optimal 22% 159 BF16 $2.08
StableLM 2 1.6B 4K ctx 1.6B optimal 25%optimal 20%optimal 20% 164 BF16 $2.02
Qwen 2 1.5B 1.5B optimal 23%optimal 18%optimal 18% 172 BF16 $1.92
Qwen 2.5 1.5B 1.5B optimal 23%optimal 18%optimal 18% 172 BF16 $1.92
Qwen 2.5 Coder 1.5B 1.5B optimal 23%optimal 18%optimal 18% 172 BF16 $1.92
LLaMA 3.2 1B 1.2B optimal 21%optimal 18%optimal 18% 188 BF16 $1.76
Falcon3 1B 4K ctx 1.0B optimal 20%optimal 17%optimal 18% 204 BF16 $1.62
Gemma 3 1B 1.0B optimal 20%optimal 17%optimal 17% 205 BF16 $1.61
Qwen3 0.6B 0.6B optimal 19%optimal 18%optimal 18% 238 BF16 $1.39
Qwen 2 0.5B 0.5B optimal 16%optimal 15%optimal 15% 254 BF16 $1.30
Qwen 2.5 0.5B 0.5B optimal 16%optimal 15%optimal 15% 254 BF16 $1.30
Qwen 2.5 Coder 0.5B 0.5B optimal 16%optimal 15%optimal 15% 254 BF16 $1.30
Kimi K3 2800.0B (104.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V4-Pro 1600.0B (49.0B active) ——— — —
Kimi K2 1000.0B (32.0B active) ——— — —
Kimi K2.5 1000.0B (32.0B active) ——— — —
GLM-5 744B 744.0B (40.0B active) ——— — —
GLM-5.1 744B 744.0B (40.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek R1 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek R1-0528 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3-0324 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3.2 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax-M1 456.0B (45.9B active) ——— — —
MiniMax-Text-01 456.0B (45.9B active) ——— — —
LLaMA 3.1 405B 405.0B ——— — —
Llama 4 Maverick (400B) 400.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 397.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Nemotron-4 340B 340.0B ——— — —
MiMo V2-Flash 309.8B (15.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V4-Flash 284.0B (13.0B active) ——— — —
Llama-3.3-Nemotron Ultra 253B 253.0B ——— — —
DeepSeek Coder V2 236.0B (21.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen3 235B-A22B 235.0B (22.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax M2.5 230.0B (10.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax M2.7 230.0B (10.0B active) ——— — —
Mixtral 8x22B 141.0B (39.0B active) ——— — —
DBRX 132B 132.0B (36.0B active) ——— — —
Devstral 2 123B 123.0B ——— — —
Mistral Large 2 123B 123.0B ——— — —
Nemotron-3 Super 120B-A12B 120.0B (12.0B active) ——— — —
Mistral Small 4 119B 119.0B (11.0B active) ——— — —
GPT OSS 120B 117.0B (5.1B active) ——— — —
Llama 4 Scout (109B) 109.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Command R+ 104B 104.0B ——— — —
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B 80.0B (3.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen 2 72B 72.0B ——— — —
Qwen 2.5 72B 72.0B ——— — —
CodeLlama 70B 70.0B ——— — —
DeepSeek R1 Distill 70B 70.0B ——— — —
LLaMA 2 70B 70.0B ——— — —
LLaMA 3.1 70B 70.0B ——— — —
LLaMA 3.3 70B 70.0B ——— — —
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B 70.0B ——— — —
Nemotron-H 56B Base 56.0B ——— — —
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-51B 51.0B ——— — —
Llama-3.3-Nemotron Super 49B 49.0B ——— — —
Falcon 40B 40.0B ——— — —
Command R 35B 35.0B ——— — —
Falcon 7B 7.0B ——— — —

Compare RTX 5090 32GB

Frequently asked questions

What is the largest LLM that fits on a single RTX 5090 32GB?

At 8K context and batch 1, the largest models in our catalog that fit on an RTX 5090 32GB (32 GB) are: Mistral Nemo 12B (12B) at BF16; Devstral 24B (24B) at FP8; Kimi Linear 48B-A3B (48B) at 4-bit (AWQ). Larger models need tensor parallelism across several GPUs or lower-precision weights.

Can an RTX 5090 32GB run LLaMA 3.3 70B?

at BF16: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at FP8: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at 4-bit (AWQ): does not fit within one 8-GPU node. 8K context, batch 1, vLLM — the calculator sizes other contexts and concurrency.

Can an RTX 5090 32GB serve DeepSeek R1?

at BF16: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at FP8: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at 4-bit (AWQ): does not fit within one 8-GPU node. 8K context, batch 1, vLLM — the calculator sizes other contexts and concurrency.

How fast is an RTX 5090 32GB for LLM inference?

Single-stream decode for LLaMA 3.1 8B at FP8 is about 95 tokens/s on one RTX 5090 32GB; decode is bound by memory bandwidth (1792 GB/s), so larger models run proportionally slower. Batching raises total throughput far above the single-stream figure.

How much does it cost to rent an RTX 5090 32GB?

For on-demand rental our catalog estimate is $0.80/hr. The $/1M tokens column above uses that price.

Methodology: every cell comes from the same engine as our GPU Lookup — weights, KV cache (including MLA latent and hybrid / sliding-window layers), activations and framework overhead per model architecture, decode speed from a calibrated memory-bandwidth roofline. Reference scenario: 8K context (4K for models with a shorter native window), batch 1, vLLM, fp16 KV cache. Fit bands: optimal 50–70% of VRAM, good 70–80%, tight 80–95%. Engineering estimates, not a guarantee — validate against your serving framework before buying hardware.