howmanygpus.ai

Best LLMs to run on RTX 4090 24GB

consumer 24 GB GDDR6X · 1008 GB/s · 165 TFLOPS BF16 · updated 2026-10-23

Headline answer

Of 141 models in our catalog, 69 fit on a single RTX 4090 24GB at FP8, 78 at 4-bit (AWQ) and 51 at BF16 (8K context, batch 1). Largest that fits: GLM-4 9B at BF16; DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite at FP8; Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B at 4-bit (AWQ). Rental: $0.34/hr catalog estimate.

Change context, concurrency or framework in the calculator → RTX 4090 24GB full specs

Every model on RTX 4090 24GB

Fit band and share of VRAM per precision; N× GPUs = minimum count inside one node (tensor parallel); — = does not fit within one 8-GPU node. Speed and $/1M tokens for the highest-quality precision that fits on one GPU (BF16, else FP8, else 4-bit), single stream.

Model Params BF16FP84-bit (AWQ) tok/s $ / 1M tok
Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B 31.6B (3.2B active) ——tight 90% 177 4-bit $1.40
Qwen3 30B-A3B 30.0B (3.0B active) ——tight 89% 178 4-bit $1.39
Devstral 24B 24.0B ——tight 83% 43 4-bit $5.70
Devstral Small 2 24B 24.0B ——tight 83% 43 4-bit $5.70
Magistral Small 24B 24.0B ——tight 83% 43 4-bit $5.70
Mistral Small 3.1 24B 24.0B ——tight 83% 43 4-bit $5.70
Codestral 22B 22.0B ——good 75% 47 4-bit $5.31
GPT OSS 20B 21.0B (3.6B active) ——good 71% 166 4-bit $1.49
InternLM 2.5 20B 20.0B ——good 74% 50 4-bit $4.90
DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite 16.0B (2.4B active) —tight 86%optimal 55% 143 FP8 $1.73
StarCoder2 15B 16.0B —tight 88%optimal 58% 34 FP8 $7.29
DeepSeek R1 Distill 14B 14.8B —tight 86%optimal 65% 36 FP8 $6.85
Qwen 2.5 14B 14.8B —tight 86%optimal 65% 36 FP8 $6.85
Qwen3 14B 14.8B —tight 85%optimal 64% 36 FP8 $6.83
Phi 3 Medium 14.0B —tight 84%optimal 56% 38 FP8 $6.52
Phi-4 14B 14.0B —tight 84%optimal 61% 38 FP8 $6.52
Qwen 2.5 Coder 14B 14.0B —tight 83%optimal 64% 38 FP8 $6.52
OLMo-2 13B 4K ctx 13.7B —tight 89%optimal 67% 37 FP8 $6.61
LLaMA 2 13B 4K ctx 13.0B —tight 86%optimal 61% 39 FP8 $6.31
Gemma 3 12B 12.0B —tight 81%optimal 69% 43 FP8 $5.78
Mistral Nemo 12B 12.0B —good 74%optimal 57% 43 FP8 $5.70
Nemotron-Nano-12B-v2 12.0B —good 77%optimal 60% 43 FP8 $5.72
StableLM 2 12B 4K ctx 12.0B —good 72%optimal 53% 43 FP8 $5.71
Falcon3 10B 10.0B —optimal 65%optimal 49% 51 FP8 $4.88
GLM-4 9B 9.0B tight 93%optimal 57%optimal 46% 30 BF16 $8.11
Gemma 2 9B 9.0B —optimal 67%optimal 60% 55 FP8 $4.53
Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 9.0B —optimal 63%optimal 52% 55 FP8 $4.49
Yi-1.5 9B 4K ctx 9.0B tight 94%optimal 57%optimal 41% 30 BF16 $8.13
InternLM3 8B 8.8B tight 92%optimal 56%optimal 44% 31 BF16 $7.95
Qwen3-VL 8B 8.8B —optimal 59%optimal 49% 56 FP8 $4.38
MiniCPM-V 4.5 8.7B tight 94%optimal 59%optimal 48% 31 BF16 $7.90
Ministral-3 8B 8.5B tight 92%optimal 58%optimal 47% 32 BF16 $7.73
Qwen2.5-VL 7B 8.3B tight 88%optimal 54%optimal 44% 33 BF16 $7.54
DeepSeek R1 Distill 8B 8.0B tight 88%optimal 56%optimal 45% 34 BF16 $7.31
Granite 3.3 8B 8.0B tight 89%optimal 57%optimal 42% 34 BF16 $7.34
LLaMA 3.1 8B 8.0B tight 88%optimal 56%optimal 45% 34 BF16 $7.31
Ministral 8B 8.0B tight 89%optimal 56%optimal 46% 34 BF16 $7.34
Qwen3 8B 8.0B tight 89%optimal 56%optimal 47% 34 BF16 $7.34
Qwen 2.5 7B 7.6B tight 82%optimal 51%optimal 42% 35 BF16 $6.98
Falcon3 7B 7.5B tight 83%optimal 53%optimal 42% 36 BF16 $6.87
Phi-3 Small 7B 7.4B tight 83%optimal 53%optimal 42% 36 BF16 $6.83
InternLM 2.5 7B 7.0B good 80%optimal 51%optimal 41% 38 BF16 $6.51
LLaMA 2 7B 4K ctx 7.0B tight 84%optimal 56%optimal 43% 37 BF16 $6.63
Mistral 7B 7.0B good 80%optimal 51%optimal 38% 38 BF16 $6.51
OLMo-2 7B 4K ctx 7.0B tight 84%optimal 56%optimal 46% 37 BF16 $6.63
Qwen 2 7B 7.0B good 77%optimal 49%optimal 41% 38 BF16 $6.49
Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B 7.0B good 77%optimal 49%optimal 41% 38 BF16 $6.49
StarCoder2 7B 7.0B good 78%optimal 49%optimal 37% 38 BF16 $6.49
Yi-1.5 6B 4K ctx 6.0B optimal 68%optimal 44%optimal 34% 44 BF16 $5.67
Qwen3-VL 4B 4.4B optimal 59%optimal 41%optimal 36% 56 BF16 $4.41
Gemma 3 4B 4.3B optimal 58%optimal 40%optimal 39% 58 BF16 $4.30
Nemotron-Mini-4B 4K ctx 4.0B optimal 52%optimal 36%optimal 38% 61 BF16 $4.05
Qwen3 4B 4.0B optimal 55%optimal 39%optimal 36% 61 BF16 $4.06
Ministral 3B 3.8B optimal 51%optimal 36%optimal 33% 64 BF16 $3.88
Phi 3.5 Mini 3.8B optimal 62%optimal 46%optimal 40% 62 BF16 $3.97
Phi-4 Mini 3.8B optimal 53%optimal 38%optimal 37% 64 BF16 $3.89
Qwen2.5-VL 3B 3.8B optimal 50%optimal 34%optimal 30% 65 BF16 $3.82
Ministral-3 3B 3.4B optimal 49%optimal 35%optimal 33% 70 BF16 $3.56
LLaMA 3.2 3B 3.2B optimal 48%optimal 34%optimal 33% 73 BF16 $3.40
Falcon3 3B 3.0B optimal 45%optimal 33%optimal 32% 77 BF16 $3.22
Qwen 2.5 3B 3.0B optimal 43%optimal 31%optimal 29% 77 BF16 $3.21
Qwen 2.5 Coder 3B 3.0B optimal 43%optimal 31%optimal 29% 77 BF16 $3.21
StarCoder2 3B 3.0B optimal 43%optimal 31%optimal 26% 77 BF16 $3.20
Qwen3-VL 2B 2.1B optimal 39%optimal 30%optimal 29% 98 BF16 $2.52
Granite 3.1 2B 2.0B optimal 36%optimal 28%optimal 25% 103 BF16 $2.40
Qwen3 1.7B 1.7B optimal 35%optimal 28%optimal 28% 114 BF16 $2.17
SmolLM2 1.7B 1.7B optimal 38%optimal 31%optimal 29% 113 BF16 $2.19
StableLM 2 1.6B 4K ctx 1.6B optimal 34%optimal 27%optimal 26% 117 BF16 $2.11
Qwen 2 1.5B 1.5B optimal 30%optimal 24%optimal 24% 125 BF16 $1.98
Qwen 2.5 1.5B 1.5B optimal 30%optimal 24%optimal 24% 125 BF16 $1.98
Qwen 2.5 Coder 1.5B 1.5B optimal 30%optimal 24%optimal 24% 125 BF16 $1.98
LLaMA 3.2 1B 1.2B optimal 28%optimal 23%optimal 24% 140 BF16 $1.77
Falcon3 1B 4K ctx 1.0B optimal 27%optimal 22%optimal 24% 156 BF16 $1.58
Gemma 3 1B 1.0B optimal 26%optimal 22%optimal 23% 158 BF16 $1.57
Qwen3 0.6B 0.6B optimal 26%optimal 23%optimal 24% 195 BF16 $1.27
Qwen 2 0.5B 0.5B optimal 22%optimal 20%optimal 20% 214 BF16 $1.15
Qwen 2.5 0.5B 0.5B optimal 22%optimal 20%optimal 20% 214 BF16 $1.15
Qwen 2.5 Coder 0.5B 0.5B optimal 22%optimal 20%optimal 20% 214 BF16 $1.15
Kimi K3 2800.0B (104.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V4-Pro 1600.0B (49.0B active) ——— — —
Kimi K2 1000.0B (32.0B active) ——— — —
Kimi K2.5 1000.0B (32.0B active) ——— — —
GLM-5 744B 744.0B (40.0B active) ——— — —
GLM-5.1 744B 744.0B (40.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek R1 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek R1-0528 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3-0324 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3.2 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax-M1 456.0B (45.9B active) ——— — —
MiniMax-Text-01 456.0B (45.9B active) ——— — —
LLaMA 3.1 405B 405.0B ——— — —
Llama 4 Maverick (400B) 400.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 397.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Nemotron-4 340B 340.0B ——— — —
MiMo V2-Flash 309.8B (15.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V4-Flash 284.0B (13.0B active) ——— — —
Llama-3.3-Nemotron Ultra 253B 253.0B ——— — —
DeepSeek Coder V2 236.0B (21.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen3 235B-A22B 235.0B (22.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax M2.5 230.0B (10.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax M2.7 230.0B (10.0B active) ——— — —
Mixtral 8x22B 141.0B (39.0B active) ——— — —
DBRX 132B 132.0B (36.0B active) ——— — —
Devstral 2 123B 123.0B ——— — —
Mistral Large 2 123B 123.0B ——— — —
Nemotron-3 Super 120B-A12B 120.0B (12.0B active) ——— — —
Mistral Small 4 119B 119.0B (11.0B active) ——— — —
GPT OSS 120B 117.0B (5.1B active) ——— — —
Llama 4 Scout (109B) 109.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Command R+ 104B 104.0B ——— — —
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B 80.0B (3.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen 2 72B 72.0B ——— — —
Qwen 2.5 72B 72.0B ——— — —
CodeLlama 70B 70.0B ——— — —
DeepSeek R1 Distill 70B 70.0B ——— — —
LLaMA 2 70B 70.0B ——— — —
LLaMA 3.1 70B 70.0B ——— — —
LLaMA 3.3 70B 70.0B ——— — —
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B 70.0B ——— — —
Nemotron-H 56B Base 56.0B ——— — —
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-51B 51.0B ——— — —
Llama-3.3-Nemotron Super 49B 49.0B ——— — —
Kimi Linear 48B-A3B 48.0B (3.0B active) ——— — —
Mixtral 8x7B 46.7B (12.9B active) ——— — —
Falcon 40B 40.0B ——— — —
Command R 35B 35.0B ——— — —
Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 35.0B (3.0B active) ——— — —
CodeLlama 34B 34.0B ——— — —
Yi-1.5 34B 34.0B ——— — —
DeepSeek R1 Distill 32B 32.0B ——— — —
Nemotron-Terminal-32B 32.0B ——— — —
OLMo-2 32B 32.0B ——— — —
Qwen 2.5 32B 32.0B ——— — —
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B 32.0B ——— — —
Qwen3 32B 32.0B ——— — —
Muse Glimmer 30B 30.0B ——— — —
Gemma 2 27B 27.0B ——— — —
Gemma 3 27B 27.0B ——— — —
Qwen3.6 27B 27.0B ——— — —
Falcon 7B 7.0B ——— — —

Compare RTX 4090 24GB

Frequently asked questions

What is the largest LLM that fits on a single RTX 4090 24GB?

At 8K context and batch 1, the largest models in our catalog that fit on an RTX 4090 24GB (24 GB) are: GLM-4 9B (9B) at BF16; DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite (16B) at FP8; Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B (31.6B) at 4-bit (AWQ). Larger models need tensor parallelism across several GPUs or lower-precision weights.

Can an RTX 4090 24GB run LLaMA 3.3 70B?

at BF16: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at FP8: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at 4-bit (AWQ): does not fit within one 8-GPU node. 8K context, batch 1, vLLM — the calculator sizes other contexts and concurrency.

Can an RTX 4090 24GB serve DeepSeek R1?

at BF16: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at FP8: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at 4-bit (AWQ): does not fit within one 8-GPU node. 8K context, batch 1, vLLM — the calculator sizes other contexts and concurrency.

How fast is an RTX 4090 24GB for LLM inference?

Single-stream decode for LLaMA 3.1 8B at FP8 is about 61 tokens/s on one RTX 4090 24GB; decode is bound by memory bandwidth (1008 GB/s), so larger models run proportionally slower. Batching raises total throughput far above the single-stream figure.

How much does it cost to rent an RTX 4090 24GB?

For on-demand rental our catalog estimate is $0.34/hr. The $/1M tokens column above uses that price.

Methodology: every cell comes from the same engine as our GPU Lookup — weights, KV cache (including MLA latent and hybrid / sliding-window layers), activations and framework overhead per model architecture, decode speed from a calibrated memory-bandwidth roofline. Reference scenario: 8K context (4K for models with a shorter native window), batch 1, vLLM, fp16 KV cache. Fit bands: optimal 50–70% of VRAM, good 70–80%, tight 80–95%. Engineering estimates, not a guarantee — validate against your serving framework before buying hardware.