howmanygpus.ai

Best LLMs to run on RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

consumer 16 GB GDDR6 · 288 GB/s · 44 TFLOPS BF16 · updated 2026-10-23

Headline answer

Of 141 models in our catalog, 53 fit on a single RTX 4060 Ti 16GB at FP8, 63 at 4-bit (AWQ) and 29 at BF16 (8K context, batch 1). Largest that fits: Qwen3-VL 4B at BF16; GLM-4 9B at FP8; DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite at 4-bit (AWQ). Rental: $0.10/hr catalog estimate.

Change context, concurrency or framework in the calculator → RTX 4060 Ti 16GB full specs

Every model on RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

Fit band and share of VRAM per precision; N× GPUs = minimum count inside one node (tensor parallel); — = does not fit within one 8-GPU node. Speed and $/1M tokens for the highest-quality precision that fits on one GPU (BF16, else FP8, else 4-bit), single stream.

Model Params BF16FP84-bit (AWQ) tok/s $ / 1M tok
DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite 16.0B (2.4B active) ——tight 83% 99 4-bit $0.45
StarCoder2 15B 16.0B ——tight 87% 20 4-bit $2.19
Phi 3 Medium 14.0B ——tight 84% 22 4-bit $1.97
Phi-4 14B 14.0B ——tight 91% 22 4-bit $1.97
LLaMA 2 13B 4K ctx 13.0B ——tight 92% 23 4-bit $1.96
Mistral Nemo 12B 12.0B ——tight 85% 26 4-bit $1.70
Nemotron-Nano-12B-v2 12.0B ——tight 90% 26 4-bit $1.72
StableLM 2 12B 4K ctx 12.0B ——good 79% 26 4-bit $1.71
Falcon3 10B 10.0B ——good 74% 31 4-bit $1.45
GLM-4 9B 9.0B —tight 85%optimal 68% 18 FP8 $2.44
Gemma 2 9B 9.0B ——tight 89% 33 4-bit $1.35
Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 9.0B —tight 95%good 77% 18 FP8 $2.48
Yi-1.5 9B 4K ctx 9.0B —tight 85%optimal 62% 18 FP8 $2.46
InternLM3 8B 8.8B —tight 84%optimal 66% 18 FP8 $2.39
Qwen3-VL 8B 8.8B —tight 89%good 73% 18 FP8 $2.40
MiniCPM-V 4.5 8.7B —tight 88%good 73% 18 FP8 $2.39
Ministral-3 8B 8.5B —tight 87%good 70% 19 FP8 $2.34
Qwen2.5-VL 7B 8.3B —tight 81%optimal 65% 20 FP8 $2.27
DeepSeek R1 Distill 8B 8.0B —tight 83%optimal 68% 20 FP8 $2.21
Granite 3.3 8B 8.0B —tight 85%optimal 64% 20 FP8 $2.21
LLaMA 3.1 8B 8.0B —tight 83%optimal 68% 20 FP8 $2.21
Ministral 8B 8.0B —tight 84%optimal 69% 20 FP8 $2.21
Qwen3 8B 8.0B —tight 84%good 70% 20 FP8 $2.21
Qwen 2.5 7B 7.6B —good 77%optimal 63% 21 FP8 $2.10
Falcon3 7B 7.5B —good 79%optimal 63% 21 FP8 $2.07
Phi-3 Small 7B 7.4B —good 79%optimal 64% 22 FP8 $2.05
InternLM 2.5 7B 7.0B —good 77%optimal 62% 23 FP8 $1.95
LLaMA 2 7B 4K ctx 7.0B —tight 84%optimal 64% 22 FP8 $2.03
Mistral 7B 7.0B —good 77%optimal 57% 23 FP8 $1.95
OLMo-2 7B 4K ctx 7.0B —tight 84%optimal 69% 22 FP8 $2.03
Qwen 2 7B 7.0B —good 73%optimal 61% 23 FP8 $1.94
Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B 7.0B —good 73%optimal 61% 23 FP8 $1.94
StarCoder2 7B 7.0B —good 73%optimal 56% 23 FP8 $1.94
Yi-1.5 6B 4K ctx 6.0B —optimal 65%optimal 52% 26 FP8 $1.68
Qwen3-VL 4B 4.4B tight 88%optimal 61%optimal 55% 18 BF16 $2.43
Gemma 3 4B 4.3B tight 86%optimal 60%optimal 59% 19 BF16 $2.36
Nemotron-Mini-4B 4K ctx 4.0B good 79%optimal 54%optimal 56% 20 BF16 $2.21
Qwen3 4B 4.0B tight 83%optimal 58%optimal 53% 20 BF16 $2.21
Ministral 3B 3.8B good 77%optimal 54%optimal 49% 21 BF16 $2.10
Phi 3.5 Mini 3.8B tight 93%optimal 70%optimal 60% 20 BF16 $2.16
Phi-4 Mini 3.8B good 80%optimal 56%optimal 56% 21 BF16 $2.11
Qwen2.5-VL 3B 3.8B good 74%optimal 51%optimal 45% 22 BF16 $2.06
Ministral-3 3B 3.4B good 73%optimal 53%optimal 49% 23 BF16 $1.89
LLaMA 3.2 3B 3.2B good 71%optimal 52%optimal 49% 25 BF16 $1.80
Falcon3 3B 3.0B optimal 68%optimal 49%optimal 47% 26 BF16 $1.69
Qwen 2.5 3B 3.0B optimal 65%optimal 46%optimal 43% 26 BF16 $1.68
Qwen 2.5 Coder 3B 3.0B optimal 65%optimal 46%optimal 43% 26 BF16 $1.68
StarCoder2 3B 3.0B optimal 65%optimal 46%optimal 40% 26 BF16 $1.68
Qwen3-VL 2B 2.1B optimal 58%optimal 45%optimal 44% 36 BF16 $1.25
Granite 3.1 2B 2.0B optimal 55%optimal 42%optimal 38% 38 BF16 $1.17
Qwen3 1.7B 1.7B optimal 53%optimal 42%optimal 43% 43 BF16 $1.03
SmolLM2 1.7B 1.7B optimal 57%optimal 46%optimal 43% 42 BF16 $1.04
StableLM 2 1.6B 4K ctx 1.6B optimal 50%optimal 41%optimal 40% 45 BF16 $0.99
Qwen 2 1.5B 1.5B optimal 46%optimal 36%optimal 36% 49 BF16 $0.91
Qwen 2.5 1.5B 1.5B optimal 46%optimal 36%optimal 36% 49 BF16 $0.91
Qwen 2.5 Coder 1.5B 1.5B optimal 46%optimal 36%optimal 36% 49 BF16 $0.91
LLaMA 3.2 1B 1.2B optimal 43%optimal 35%optimal 36% 57 BF16 $0.77
Falcon3 1B 4K ctx 1.0B optimal 40%optimal 34%optimal 35% 67 BF16 $0.66
Gemma 3 1B 1.0B optimal 39%optimal 33%optimal 35% 68 BF16 $0.65
Qwen3 0.6B 0.6B optimal 39%optimal 35%optimal 36% 96 BF16 $0.46
Qwen 2 0.5B 0.5B optimal 32%optimal 29%optimal 30% 113 BF16 $0.39
Qwen 2.5 0.5B 0.5B optimal 32%optimal 29%optimal 30% 113 BF16 $0.39
Qwen 2.5 Coder 0.5B 0.5B optimal 32%optimal 29%optimal 30% 113 BF16 $0.39
Kimi K3 2800.0B (104.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V4-Pro 1600.0B (49.0B active) ——— — —
Kimi K2 1000.0B (32.0B active) ——— — —
Kimi K2.5 1000.0B (32.0B active) ——— — —
GLM-5 744B 744.0B (40.0B active) ——— — —
GLM-5.1 744B 744.0B (40.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek R1 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek R1-0528 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3-0324 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3.2 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax-M1 456.0B (45.9B active) ——— — —
MiniMax-Text-01 456.0B (45.9B active) ——— — —
LLaMA 3.1 405B 405.0B ——— — —
Llama 4 Maverick (400B) 400.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 397.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Nemotron-4 340B 340.0B ——— — —
MiMo V2-Flash 309.8B (15.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V4-Flash 284.0B (13.0B active) ——— — —
Llama-3.3-Nemotron Ultra 253B 253.0B ——— — —
DeepSeek Coder V2 236.0B (21.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen3 235B-A22B 235.0B (22.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax M2.5 230.0B (10.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax M2.7 230.0B (10.0B active) ——— — —
Mixtral 8x22B 141.0B (39.0B active) ——— — —
DBRX 132B 132.0B (36.0B active) ——— — —
Devstral 2 123B 123.0B ——— — —
Mistral Large 2 123B 123.0B ——— — —
Nemotron-3 Super 120B-A12B 120.0B (12.0B active) ——— — —
Mistral Small 4 119B 119.0B (11.0B active) ——— — —
GPT OSS 120B 117.0B (5.1B active) ——— — —
Llama 4 Scout (109B) 109.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Command R+ 104B 104.0B ——— — —
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B 80.0B (3.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen 2 72B 72.0B ——— — —
Qwen 2.5 72B 72.0B ——— — —
CodeLlama 70B 70.0B ——— — —
DeepSeek R1 Distill 70B 70.0B ——— — —
LLaMA 2 70B 70.0B ——— — —
LLaMA 3.1 70B 70.0B ——— — —
LLaMA 3.3 70B 70.0B ——— — —
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B 70.0B ——— — —
Nemotron-H 56B Base 56.0B ——— — —
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-51B 51.0B ——— — —
Llama-3.3-Nemotron Super 49B 49.0B ——— — —
Kimi Linear 48B-A3B 48.0B (3.0B active) ——— — —
Mixtral 8x7B 46.7B (12.9B active) ——— — —
Falcon 40B 40.0B ——— — —
Command R 35B 35.0B ——— — —
Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 35.0B (3.0B active) ——— — —
CodeLlama 34B 34.0B ——— — —
Yi-1.5 34B 34.0B ——— — —
DeepSeek R1 Distill 32B 32.0B ——— — —
Nemotron-Terminal-32B 32.0B ——— — —
OLMo-2 32B 32.0B ——— — —
Qwen 2.5 32B 32.0B ——— — —
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B 32.0B ——— — —
Qwen3 32B 32.0B ——— — —
Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B 31.6B (3.2B active) ——— — —
Muse Glimmer 30B 30.0B ——— — —
Qwen3 30B-A3B 30.0B (3.0B active) ——— — —
Gemma 2 27B 27.0B ——— — —
Gemma 3 27B 27.0B ——— — —
Qwen3.6 27B 27.0B ——— — —
Devstral 24B 24.0B ——— — —
Devstral Small 2 24B 24.0B ——— — —
Magistral Small 24B 24.0B ——— — —
Mistral Small 3.1 24B 24.0B ——— — —
Codestral 22B 22.0B ——— — —
GPT OSS 20B 21.0B (3.6B active) ——— — —
InternLM 2.5 20B 20.0B ——— — —
DeepSeek R1 Distill 14B 14.8B ——— — —
Qwen 2.5 14B 14.8B ——— — —
Qwen3 14B 14.8B ——— — —
Qwen 2.5 Coder 14B 14.0B ——— — —
OLMo-2 13B 13.7B ——— — —
Gemma 3 12B 12.0B ——— — —
Falcon 7B 7.0B ——— — —

Frequently asked questions

What is the largest LLM that fits on a single RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?

At 8K context and batch 1, the largest models in our catalog that fit on an RTX 4060 Ti 16GB (16 GB) are: Qwen3-VL 4B (4.44B) at BF16; GLM-4 9B (9B) at FP8; DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite (16B) at 4-bit (AWQ). Larger models need tensor parallelism across several GPUs or lower-precision weights.

Can an RTX 4060 Ti 16GB run LLaMA 3.3 70B?

at BF16: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at FP8: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at 4-bit (AWQ): does not fit within one 8-GPU node. 8K context, batch 1, vLLM — the calculator sizes other contexts and concurrency.

Can an RTX 4060 Ti 16GB serve DeepSeek R1?

at BF16: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at FP8: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at 4-bit (AWQ): does not fit within one 8-GPU node. 8K context, batch 1, vLLM — the calculator sizes other contexts and concurrency.

How fast is an RTX 4060 Ti 16GB for LLM inference?

Single-stream decode for LLaMA 3.1 8B at FP8 is about 20 tokens/s on one RTX 4060 Ti 16GB; decode is bound by memory bandwidth (288 GB/s), so larger models run proportionally slower. Batching raises total throughput far above the single-stream figure.

How much does it cost to rent an RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?

For on-demand rental our catalog estimate is $0.10/hr. The $/1M tokens column above uses that price.

Methodology: every cell comes from the same engine as our GPU Lookup — weights, KV cache (including MLA latent and hybrid / sliding-window layers), activations and framework overhead per model architecture, decode speed from a calibrated memory-bandwidth roofline. Reference scenario: 8K context (4K for models with a shorter native window), batch 1, vLLM, fp16 KV cache. Fit bands: optimal 50–70% of VRAM, good 70–80%, tight 80–95%. Engineering estimates, not a guarantee — validate against your serving framework before buying hardware.