howmanygpus.ai

Best LLMs to run on RTX 3090 Ti 24GB

consumer 24 GB GDDR6X · 1008 GB/s · 80 TFLOPS BF16 · updated 2026-10-23

Headline answer

Of 141 models in our catalog, 69 fit on a single RTX 3090 Ti 24GB at FP8, 78 at 4-bit (AWQ) and 51 at BF16 (8K context, batch 1). Largest that fits: GLM-4 9B at BF16; DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite at FP8; Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B at 4-bit (AWQ). Rental: $0.16/hr catalog estimate.

Change context, concurrency or framework in the calculator → RTX 3090 Ti 24GB full specs

Every model on RTX 3090 Ti 24GB

Fit band and share of VRAM per precision; N× GPUs = minimum count inside one node (tensor parallel); — = does not fit within one 8-GPU node. Speed and $/1M tokens for the highest-quality precision that fits on one GPU (BF16, else FP8, else 4-bit), single stream.

Model Params BF16FP84-bit (AWQ) tok/s $ / 1M tok
Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B 31.6B (3.2B active) —2× GPUstight 90% 177 4-bit $0.72
Qwen3 30B-A3B 30.0B (3.0B active) —2× GPUstight 89% 178 4-bit $0.72
Devstral 24B 24.0B —2× GPUstight 83% 43 4-bit $2.94
Devstral Small 2 24B 24.0B —2× GPUstight 83% 43 4-bit $2.94
Magistral Small 24B 24.0B —2× GPUstight 83% 43 4-bit $2.94
Mistral Small 3.1 24B 24.0B —2× GPUstight 83% 43 4-bit $2.94
Codestral 22B 22.0B —2× GPUsgood 75% 47 4-bit $2.74
GPT OSS 20B 21.0B (3.6B active) —2× GPUsgood 71% 166 4-bit $0.77
InternLM 2.5 20B 20.0B —2× GPUsgood 74% 50 4-bit $2.53
DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite 16.0B (2.4B active) 2× GPUstight 86%optimal 55% 143 FP8 $0.90
StarCoder2 15B 16.0B 2× GPUstight 88%optimal 58% 34 FP8 $3.77
DeepSeek R1 Distill 14B 14.8B 2× GPUstight 86%optimal 65% 36 FP8 $3.54
Qwen 2.5 14B 14.8B 2× GPUstight 86%optimal 65% 36 FP8 $3.54
Qwen3 14B 14.8B 2× GPUstight 85%optimal 64% 36 FP8 $3.53
Phi 3 Medium 14.0B 2× GPUstight 84%optimal 56% 38 FP8 $3.37
Phi-4 14B 14.0B 2× GPUstight 84%optimal 61% 38 FP8 $3.37
Qwen 2.5 Coder 14B 14.0B 2× GPUstight 83%optimal 64% 38 FP8 $3.37
OLMo-2 13B 4K ctx 13.7B 2× GPUstight 89%optimal 67% 37 FP8 $3.42
LLaMA 2 13B 4K ctx 13.0B 2× GPUstight 86%optimal 61% 39 FP8 $3.26
Gemma 3 12B 12.0B 2× GPUstight 81%optimal 69% 43 FP8 $2.99
Mistral Nemo 12B 12.0B 2× GPUsgood 74%optimal 57% 43 FP8 $2.94
Nemotron-Nano-12B-v2 12.0B 2× GPUsgood 77%optimal 60% 43 FP8 $2.96
StableLM 2 12B 4K ctx 12.0B 2× GPUsgood 72%optimal 53% 43 FP8 $2.95
Falcon3 10B 10.0B 2× GPUsoptimal 65%optimal 49% 51 FP8 $2.52
GLM-4 9B 9.0B tight 93%optimal 57%optimal 46% 30 BF16 $4.19
Gemma 2 9B 9.0B 2× GPUsoptimal 67%optimal 60% 55 FP8 $2.34
Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 9.0B 2× GPUsoptimal 63%optimal 52% 55 FP8 $2.32
Yi-1.5 9B 4K ctx 9.0B tight 94%optimal 57%optimal 41% 30 BF16 $4.20
InternLM3 8B 8.8B tight 92%optimal 56%optimal 44% 31 BF16 $4.11
Qwen3-VL 8B 8.8B 2× GPUsoptimal 59%optimal 49% 56 FP8 $2.26
MiniCPM-V 4.5 8.7B tight 94%optimal 59%optimal 48% 31 BF16 $4.08
Ministral-3 8B 8.5B tight 92%optimal 58%optimal 47% 32 BF16 $3.99
Qwen2.5-VL 7B 8.3B tight 88%optimal 54%optimal 44% 33 BF16 $3.90
DeepSeek R1 Distill 8B 8.0B tight 88%optimal 56%optimal 45% 34 BF16 $3.78
Granite 3.3 8B 8.0B tight 89%optimal 57%optimal 42% 34 BF16 $3.79
LLaMA 3.1 8B 8.0B tight 88%optimal 56%optimal 45% 34 BF16 $3.78
Ministral 8B 8.0B tight 89%optimal 56%optimal 46% 34 BF16 $3.79
Qwen3 8B 8.0B tight 89%optimal 56%optimal 47% 34 BF16 $3.79
Qwen 2.5 7B 7.6B tight 82%optimal 51%optimal 42% 35 BF16 $3.61
Falcon3 7B 7.5B tight 83%optimal 53%optimal 42% 36 BF16 $3.55
Phi-3 Small 7B 7.4B tight 83%optimal 53%optimal 42% 36 BF16 $3.53
InternLM 2.5 7B 7.0B good 80%optimal 51%optimal 41% 38 BF16 $3.36
LLaMA 2 7B 4K ctx 7.0B tight 84%optimal 56%optimal 43% 37 BF16 $3.43
Mistral 7B 7.0B good 80%optimal 51%optimal 38% 38 BF16 $3.36
OLMo-2 7B 4K ctx 7.0B tight 84%optimal 56%optimal 46% 37 BF16 $3.43
Qwen 2 7B 7.0B good 77%optimal 49%optimal 41% 38 BF16 $3.35
Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B 7.0B good 77%optimal 49%optimal 41% 38 BF16 $3.35
StarCoder2 7B 7.0B good 78%optimal 49%optimal 37% 38 BF16 $3.35
Yi-1.5 6B 4K ctx 6.0B optimal 68%optimal 44%optimal 34% 44 BF16 $2.93
Qwen3-VL 4B 4.4B optimal 59%optimal 41%optimal 36% 56 BF16 $2.28
Gemma 3 4B 4.3B optimal 58%optimal 40%optimal 39% 58 BF16 $2.22
Nemotron-Mini-4B 4K ctx 4.0B optimal 52%optimal 36%optimal 38% 61 BF16 $2.09
Qwen3 4B 4.0B optimal 55%optimal 39%optimal 36% 61 BF16 $2.10
Ministral 3B 3.8B optimal 51%optimal 36%optimal 33% 64 BF16 $2.00
Phi 3.5 Mini 3.8B optimal 62%optimal 46%optimal 40% 62 BF16 $2.05
Phi-4 Mini 3.8B optimal 53%optimal 38%optimal 37% 64 BF16 $2.01
Qwen2.5-VL 3B 3.8B optimal 50%optimal 34%optimal 30% 65 BF16 $1.97
Ministral-3 3B 3.4B optimal 49%optimal 35%optimal 33% 70 BF16 $1.84
LLaMA 3.2 3B 3.2B optimal 48%optimal 34%optimal 33% 73 BF16 $1.76
Falcon3 3B 3.0B optimal 45%optimal 33%optimal 32% 77 BF16 $1.67
Qwen 2.5 3B 3.0B optimal 43%optimal 31%optimal 29% 77 BF16 $1.66
Qwen 2.5 Coder 3B 3.0B optimal 43%optimal 31%optimal 29% 77 BF16 $1.66
StarCoder2 3B 3.0B optimal 43%optimal 31%optimal 26% 77 BF16 $1.66
Qwen3-VL 2B 2.1B optimal 39%optimal 30%optimal 29% 98 BF16 $1.30
Granite 3.1 2B 2.0B optimal 36%optimal 28%optimal 25% 103 BF16 $1.24
Qwen3 1.7B 1.7B optimal 35%optimal 28%optimal 28% 114 BF16 $1.12
SmolLM2 1.7B 1.7B optimal 38%optimal 31%optimal 29% 113 BF16 $1.13
StableLM 2 1.6B 4K ctx 1.6B optimal 34%optimal 27%optimal 26% 117 BF16 $1.09
Qwen 2 1.5B 1.5B optimal 30%optimal 24%optimal 24% 125 BF16 $1.02
Qwen 2.5 1.5B 1.5B optimal 30%optimal 24%optimal 24% 125 BF16 $1.02
Qwen 2.5 Coder 1.5B 1.5B optimal 30%optimal 24%optimal 24% 125 BF16 $1.02
LLaMA 3.2 1B 1.2B optimal 28%optimal 23%optimal 24% 140 BF16 $0.91
Falcon3 1B 4K ctx 1.0B optimal 27%optimal 22%optimal 24% 156 BF16 $0.82
Gemma 3 1B 1.0B optimal 26%optimal 22%optimal 23% 158 BF16 $0.81
Qwen3 0.6B 0.6B optimal 26%optimal 23%optimal 24% 195 BF16 $0.66
Qwen 2 0.5B 0.5B optimal 22%optimal 20%optimal 20% 214 BF16 $0.60
Qwen 2.5 0.5B 0.5B optimal 22%optimal 20%optimal 20% 214 BF16 $0.60
Qwen 2.5 Coder 0.5B 0.5B optimal 22%optimal 20%optimal 20% 214 BF16 $0.60
Nemotron-H 56B Base 56.0B ——2× GPUs 33 4-bit, 2× GPUs $7.84
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-51B 51.0B ——2× GPUs 36 4-bit, 2× GPUs $7.18
Llama-3.3-Nemotron Super 49B 49.0B ——2× GPUs 37 4-bit, 2× GPUs $6.93
Kimi Linear 48B-A3B 48.0B (3.0B active) ——2× GPUs 174 4-bit, 2× GPUs $1.47
Mixtral 8x7B 46.7B (12.9B active) ——2× GPUs 84 4-bit, 2× GPUs $3.03
Command R 35B 35.0B ——2× GPUs 48 4-bit, 2× GPUs $5.38
Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 35.0B (3.0B active) ——2× GPUs 185 4-bit, 2× GPUs $1.38
CodeLlama 34B 34.0B —2× GPUs2× GPUs 28 FP8, 2× GPUs $9.29
Yi-1.5 34B 4K ctx 34.0B —2× GPUs2× GPUs 28 FP8, 2× GPUs $9.29
DeepSeek R1 Distill 32B 32.0B —2× GPUs2× GPUs 29 FP8, 2× GPUs $8.81
Nemotron-Terminal-32B 32.0B —2× GPUs2× GPUs 29 FP8, 2× GPUs $8.81
OLMo-2 32B 4K ctx 32.0B —2× GPUs2× GPUs 29 FP8, 2× GPUs $8.81
Qwen 2.5 32B 32.0B —2× GPUs2× GPUs 29 FP8, 2× GPUs $8.81
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B 32.0B —2× GPUs2× GPUs 29 FP8, 2× GPUs $8.81
Qwen3 32B 32.0B —2× GPUs2× GPUs 29 FP8, 2× GPUs $8.81
Muse Glimmer 30B 30.0B —2× GPUs2× GPUs 31 FP8, 2× GPUs $8.27
Gemma 2 27B 27.0B —2× GPUs2× GPUs 34 FP8, 2× GPUs $7.58
Gemma 3 27B 27.0B —2× GPUs2× GPUs 34 FP8, 2× GPUs $7.61
Qwen3.6 27B 27.0B —2× GPUs2× GPUs 34 FP8, 2× GPUs $7.56
Kimi K3 2800.0B (104.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V4-Pro 1600.0B (49.0B active) ——— — —
Kimi K2 1000.0B (32.0B active) ——— — —
Kimi K2.5 1000.0B (32.0B active) ——— — —
GLM-5 744B 744.0B (40.0B active) ——— — —
GLM-5.1 744B 744.0B (40.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek R1 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek R1-0528 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3-0324 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3.2 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax-M1 456.0B (45.9B active) ——— — —
MiniMax-Text-01 456.0B (45.9B active) ——— — —
LLaMA 3.1 405B 405.0B ——— — —
Llama 4 Maverick (400B) 400.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 397.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Nemotron-4 340B 340.0B ——— — —
MiMo V2-Flash 309.8B (15.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V4-Flash 284.0B (13.0B active) ——— — —
Llama-3.3-Nemotron Ultra 253B 253.0B ——— — —
DeepSeek Coder V2 236.0B (21.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen3 235B-A22B 235.0B (22.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax M2.5 230.0B (10.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax M2.7 230.0B (10.0B active) ——— — —
Mixtral 8x22B 141.0B (39.0B active) ——— — —
DBRX 132B 132.0B (36.0B active) ——— — —
Devstral 2 123B 123.0B ——— — —
Mistral Large 2 123B 123.0B ——— — —
Nemotron-3 Super 120B-A12B 120.0B (12.0B active) ——— — —
Mistral Small 4 119B 119.0B (11.0B active) ——— — —
GPT OSS 120B 117.0B (5.1B active) ——— — —
Llama 4 Scout (109B) 109.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Command R+ 104B 104.0B ——— — —
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B 80.0B (3.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen 2 72B 72.0B ——— — —
Qwen 2.5 72B 72.0B ——— — —
CodeLlama 70B 70.0B ——— — —
DeepSeek R1 Distill 70B 70.0B ——— — —
LLaMA 2 70B 70.0B ——— — —
LLaMA 3.1 70B 70.0B ——— — —
LLaMA 3.3 70B 70.0B ——— — —
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B 70.0B ——— — —
Falcon 40B 40.0B ——— — —
Falcon 7B 7.0B ——— — —

Frequently asked questions

What is the largest LLM that fits on a single RTX 3090 Ti 24GB?

At 8K context and batch 1, the largest models in our catalog that fit on an RTX 3090 Ti 24GB (24 GB) are: GLM-4 9B (9B) at BF16; DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite (16B) at FP8; Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B (31.6B) at 4-bit (AWQ). Larger models need tensor parallelism across several GPUs or lower-precision weights.

Can an RTX 3090 Ti 24GB run LLaMA 3.3 70B?

at BF16: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at FP8: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at 4-bit (AWQ): does not fit within one 8-GPU node. 8K context, batch 1, vLLM — the calculator sizes other contexts and concurrency.

Can an RTX 3090 Ti 24GB serve DeepSeek R1?

at BF16: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at FP8: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at 4-bit (AWQ): does not fit within one 8-GPU node. 8K context, batch 1, vLLM — the calculator sizes other contexts and concurrency.

How fast is an RTX 3090 Ti 24GB for LLM inference?

Single-stream decode for LLaMA 3.1 8B at FP8 is about 61 tokens/s on one RTX 3090 Ti 24GB; decode is bound by memory bandwidth (1008 GB/s), so larger models run proportionally slower. Batching raises total throughput far above the single-stream figure.

How much does it cost to rent an RTX 3090 Ti 24GB?

For on-demand rental our catalog estimate is $0.16/hr. The $/1M tokens column above uses that price.

Methodology: every cell comes from the same engine as our GPU Lookup — weights, KV cache (including MLA latent and hybrid / sliding-window layers), activations and framework overhead per model architecture, decode speed from a calibrated memory-bandwidth roofline. Reference scenario: 8K context (4K for models with a shorter native window), batch 1, vLLM, fp16 KV cache. Fit bands: optimal 50–70% of VRAM, good 70–80%, tight 80–95%. Engineering estimates, not a guarantee — validate against your serving framework before buying hardware.