howmanygpus.ai

Best LLMs to run on GH200 NVL32 (141 GB)

datacenter 141 GB HBM3e · 4900 GB/s · 989 TFLOPS BF16 · updated 2026-10-23

Headline answer

Of 141 models in our catalog, 113 fit on a single GH200 NVL32 at FP8, 119 at 4-bit (AWQ) and 97 at BF16 (8K context, batch 1). Largest that fits: Nemotron-H 56B Base at BF16; Devstral 2 123B at FP8; DeepSeek Coder V2 at 4-bit (AWQ). Rental: $1.49/hr catalog estimate.

Change context, concurrency or framework in the calculator → GH200 NVL32 full specs

Every model on GH200 NVL32

Fit band and share of VRAM per precision; N× GPUs = minimum count inside one node (tensor parallel); — = does not fit within one 8-GPU node. Speed and $/1M tokens for the highest-quality precision that fits on one GPU (BF16, else FP8, else 4-bit), single stream.

Model Params BF16FP84-bit (AWQ) tok/s $ / 1M tok
DeepSeek Coder V2 236.0B (21.0B active) 8× GPUs2× GPUstight 92% 152 4-bit $2.73
Qwen3 235B-A22B 235.0B (22.0B active) 8× GPUs2× GPUstight 92% 147 4-bit $2.81
MiniMax M2.5 230.0B (10.0B active) 4× GPUs2× GPUstight 90% 210 4-bit $1.97
MiniMax M2.7 230.0B (10.0B active) 4× GPUs2× GPUstight 90% 210 4-bit $1.97
Mixtral 8x22B 141.0B (39.0B active) 4× GPUs2× GPUsoptimal 57% 103 4-bit $4.01
DBRX 132B 132.0B (36.0B active) 4× GPUs2× GPUsoptimal 54% 109 4-bit $3.79
Devstral 2 123B 123.0B 2× GPUstight 94%optimal 54% 22 FP8 $18.56
Mistral Large 2 123B 123.0B 2× GPUstight 94%optimal 51% 22 FP8 $18.56
Nemotron-3 Super 120B-A12B 120.0B (12.0B active) 2× GPUstight 90%optimal 49% 141 FP8 $2.94
Mistral Small 4 119B 119.0B (11.0B active) 2× GPUstight 89%optimal 48% 148 FP8 $2.79
GPT OSS 120B 117.0B (5.1B active) 2× GPUstight 88%optimal 48% 210 FP8 $1.97
Llama 4 Scout (109B) 109.0B (17.0B active) 2× GPUstight 83%optimal 46% 113 FP8 $3.66
Command R+ 104B 104.0B 2× GPUsgood 80%optimal 49% 26 FP8 $15.92
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B 80.0B (3.0B active) 2× GPUsoptimal 61%optimal 34% 247 FP8 $1.67
Qwen 2 72B 72.0B 2× GPUsoptimal 57%optimal 34% 36 FP8 $11.40
Qwen 2.5 72B 72.0B 2× GPUsoptimal 57%optimal 34% 36 FP8 $11.40
CodeLlama 70B 70.0B 2× GPUsoptimal 55%optimal 31% 37 FP8 $11.13
DeepSeek R1 Distill 70B 70.0B 2× GPUsoptimal 55%optimal 33% 37 FP8 $11.13
LLaMA 2 70B 4K ctx 70.0B 2× GPUsoptimal 54%optimal 30% 37 FP8 $11.13
LLaMA 3.1 70B 70.0B 2× GPUsoptimal 55%optimal 33% 37 FP8 $11.13
LLaMA 3.3 70B 70.0B 2× GPUsoptimal 55%optimal 33% 37 FP8 $11.13
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B 70.0B 2× GPUsoptimal 55%optimal 33% 37 FP8 $11.13
Nemotron-H 56B Base 56.0B tight 85%optimal 46%optimal 29% 24 BF16 $17.03
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-51B 51.0B good 76%optimal 41%optimal 25% 26 BF16 $15.62
Llama-3.3-Nemotron Super 49B 49.0B good 74%optimal 40%optimal 24% 28 BF16 $15.05
Kimi Linear 48B-A3B 48.0B (3.0B active) good 71%optimal 38%optimal 22% 198 BF16 $2.09
Mixtral 8x7B 46.7B (12.9B active) optimal 70%optimal 37%optimal 21% 85 BF16 $4.89
Command R 35B 35.0B optimal 60%optimal 36%optimal 28% 37 BF16 $11.25
Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 35.0B (3.0B active) optimal 53%optimal 29%optimal 17% 198 BF16 $2.10
CodeLlama 34B 34.0B optimal 52%optimal 29%optimal 17% 38 BF16 $10.83
Yi-1.5 34B 4K ctx 34.0B optimal 52%optimal 28%optimal 17% 38 BF16 $10.83
DeepSeek R1 Distill 32B 32.0B optimal 50%optimal 28%optimal 18% 40 BF16 $10.27
Nemotron-Terminal-32B 32.0B optimal 50%optimal 28%optimal 18% 40 BF16 $10.27
OLMo-2 32B 4K ctx 32.0B optimal 49%optimal 27%optimal 16% 40 BF16 $10.27
Qwen 2.5 32B 32.0B optimal 50%optimal 28%optimal 18% 40 BF16 $10.27
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B 32.0B optimal 50%optimal 28%optimal 18% 40 BF16 $10.27
Qwen3 32B 32.0B optimal 50%optimal 28%optimal 18% 40 BF16 $10.27
Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B 31.6B (3.2B active) optimal 48%optimal 26%optimal 15% 193 BF16 $2.14
Muse Glimmer 30B 30.0B optimal 46%optimal 25%optimal 16% 43 BF16 $9.69
Qwen3 30B-A3B 30.0B (3.0B active) optimal 46%optimal 25%optimal 15% 197 BF16 $2.10
Gemma 2 27B 27.0B optimal 43%optimal 25%optimal 18% 47 BF16 $8.88
Gemma 3 27B 27.0B optimal 44%optimal 25%optimal 19% 46 BF16 $8.90
Qwen3.6 27B 27.0B optimal 43%optimal 24%optimal 17% 47 BF16 $8.86
Devstral 24B 24.0B optimal 38%optimal 21%optimal 14% 52 BF16 $8.02
Devstral Small 2 24B 24.0B optimal 38%optimal 21%optimal 14% 52 BF16 $8.02
Magistral Small 24B 24.0B optimal 38%optimal 21%optimal 14% 52 BF16 $8.02
Mistral Small 3.1 24B 24.0B optimal 38%optimal 21%optimal 14% 52 BF16 $8.02
Codestral 22B 22.0B optimal 35%optimal 20%optimal 13% 56 BF16 $7.46
GPT OSS 20B 21.0B (3.6B active) optimal 33%optimal 18%optimal 12% 183 BF16 $2.26
InternLM 2.5 20B 20.0B optimal 32%optimal 18%optimal 13% 60 BF16 $6.90
DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite 16.0B (2.4B active) optimal 26%optimal 15%optimal 9% 216 BF16 $1.92
StarCoder2 15B 16.0B optimal 26%optimal 15%optimal 10% 72 BF16 $5.74
DeepSeek R1 Distill 14B 14.8B optimal 25%optimal 15%optimal 11% 76 BF16 $5.42
Qwen 2.5 14B 14.8B optimal 25%optimal 15%optimal 11% 76 BF16 $5.42
Qwen3 14B 14.8B optimal 25%optimal 14%optimal 11% 76 BF16 $5.42
Phi 3 Medium 14.0B optimal 24%optimal 14%optimal 10% 80 BF16 $5.21
Phi-4 14B 14.0B optimal 24%optimal 14%optimal 10% 80 BF16 $5.21
Qwen 2.5 Coder 14B 14.0B optimal 24%optimal 14%optimal 11% 80 BF16 $5.21
OLMo-2 13B 4K ctx 13.7B optimal 25%optimal 15%optimal 11% 80 BF16 $5.19
LLaMA 2 13B 4K ctx 13.0B optimal 24%optimal 15%optimal 10% 83 BF16 $4.99
Gemma 3 12B 12.0B optimal 22%optimal 14%optimal 12% 89 BF16 $4.66
Mistral Nemo 12B 12.0B optimal 21%optimal 12%optimal 10% 89 BF16 $4.64
Nemotron-Nano-12B-v2 12.0B optimal 21%optimal 13%optimal 10% 89 BF16 $4.65
StableLM 2 12B 4K ctx 12.0B optimal 20%optimal 12%optimal 9% 89 BF16 $4.64
Falcon3 10B 10.0B optimal 18%optimal 11%optimal 8% 102 BF16 $4.07
GLM-4 9B 9.0B optimal 16%optimal 10%optimal 8% 110 BF16 $3.78
Gemma 2 9B 9.0B optimal 18%optimal 11%optimal 10% 109 BF16 $3.81
Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 9.0B optimal 17%optimal 11%optimal 9% 109 BF16 $3.80
Yi-1.5 9B 4K ctx 9.0B optimal 16%optimal 10%optimal 7% 109 BF16 $3.79
InternLM3 8B 8.8B optimal 16%optimal 10%optimal 8% 111 BF16 $3.73
Qwen3-VL 8B 8.8B optimal 16%optimal 10%optimal 8% 111 BF16 $3.73
MiniCPM-V 4.5 8.7B optimal 16%optimal 10%optimal 8% 112 BF16 $3.71
Ministral-3 8B 8.5B optimal 16%optimal 10%optimal 8% 113 BF16 $3.65
Qwen2.5-VL 7B 8.3B optimal 15%optimal 9%optimal 7% 116 BF16 $3.58
DeepSeek R1 Distill 8B 8.0B optimal 15%optimal 9%optimal 8% 118 BF16 $3.51
Granite 3.3 8B 8.0B optimal 15%optimal 10%optimal 7% 118 BF16 $3.51
LLaMA 3.1 8B 8.0B optimal 15%optimal 9%optimal 8% 118 BF16 $3.51
Ministral 8B 8.0B optimal 15%optimal 10%optimal 8% 118 BF16 $3.51
Qwen3 8B 8.0B optimal 15%optimal 10%optimal 8% 118 BF16 $3.51
Qwen 2.5 7B 7.6B optimal 14%optimal 9%optimal 7% 122 BF16 $3.39
Falcon3 7B 7.5B optimal 14%optimal 9%optimal 7% 123 BF16 $3.35
Phi-3 Small 7B 7.4B optimal 14%optimal 9%optimal 7% 124 BF16 $3.34
InternLM 2.5 7B 7.0B optimal 14%optimal 9%optimal 7% 128 BF16 $3.23
LLaMA 2 7B 4K ctx 7.0B optimal 14%optimal 10%optimal 7% 127 BF16 $3.27
Mistral 7B 7.0B optimal 14%optimal 9%optimal 6% 128 BF16 $3.23
OLMo-2 7B 4K ctx 7.0B optimal 14%optimal 10%optimal 8% 127 BF16 $3.27
Qwen 2 7B 7.0B optimal 13%optimal 8%optimal 7% 129 BF16 $3.22
Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B 7.0B optimal 13%optimal 8%optimal 7% 129 BF16 $3.22
StarCoder2 7B 7.0B optimal 13%optimal 8%optimal 6% 129 BF16 $3.22
Yi-1.5 6B 4K ctx 6.0B optimal 12%optimal 7%optimal 6% 141 BF16 $2.94
Qwen3-VL 4B 4.4B optimal 10%optimal 7%optimal 6% 165 BF16 $2.51
Gemma 3 4B 4.3B optimal 10%optimal 7%optimal 7% 168 BF16 $2.47
Nemotron-Mini-4B 4K ctx 4.0B optimal 9%optimal 6%optimal 6% 174 BF16 $2.38
Qwen3 4B 4.0B optimal 9%optimal 7%optimal 6% 174 BF16 $2.38
Ministral 3B 3.8B optimal 9%optimal 6%optimal 6% 178 BF16 $2.32
Phi 3.5 Mini 3.8B optimal 11%optimal 8%optimal 7% 176 BF16 $2.35
Phi-4 Mini 3.8B optimal 9%optimal 6%optimal 6% 178 BF16 $2.33
Qwen2.5-VL 3B 3.8B optimal 8%optimal 6%optimal 5% 180 BF16 $2.30
Ministral-3 3B 3.4B optimal 8%optimal 6%optimal 6% 187 BF16 $2.21
LLaMA 3.2 3B 3.2B optimal 8%optimal 6%optimal 6% 192 BF16 $2.16
Falcon3 3B 3.0B optimal 8%optimal 6%optimal 5% 198 BF16 $2.10
Qwen 2.5 3B 3.0B optimal 7%optimal 5%optimal 5% 198 BF16 $2.09
Qwen 2.5 Coder 3B 3.0B optimal 7%optimal 5%optimal 5% 198 BF16 $2.09
StarCoder2 3B 3.0B optimal 7%optimal 5%optimal 4% 198 BF16 $2.09
Qwen3-VL 2B 2.1B optimal 7%optimal 5%optimal 5% 223 BF16 $1.85
Granite 3.1 2B 2.0B optimal 6%optimal 5%optimal 4% 228 BF16 $1.81
Qwen3 1.7B 1.7B optimal 6%optimal 5%optimal 5% 239 BF16 $1.73
SmolLM2 1.7B 1.7B optimal 6%optimal 5%optimal 5% 238 BF16 $1.74
StableLM 2 1.6B 4K ctx 1.6B optimal 6%optimal 5%optimal 4% 242 BF16 $1.71
Qwen 2 1.5B 1.5B optimal 5%optimal 4%optimal 4% 248 BF16 $1.67
Qwen 2.5 1.5B 1.5B optimal 5%optimal 4%optimal 4% 248 BF16 $1.67
Qwen 2.5 Coder 1.5B 1.5B optimal 5%optimal 4%optimal 4% 248 BF16 $1.67
LLaMA 3.2 1B 1.2B optimal 5%optimal 4%optimal 4% 260 BF16 $1.59
Falcon3 1B 4K ctx 1.0B optimal 4%optimal 4%optimal 4% 270 BF16 $1.53
Gemma 3 1B 1.0B optimal 4%optimal 4%optimal 4% 271 BF16 $1.53
Qwen3 0.6B 0.6B optimal 4%optimal 4%optimal 4% 291 BF16 $1.42
Qwen 2 0.5B 0.5B optimal 4%optimal 3%optimal 3% 299 BF16 $1.38
Qwen 2.5 0.5B 0.5B optimal 4%optimal 3%optimal 3% 299 BF16 $1.38
Qwen 2.5 Coder 0.5B 0.5B optimal 4%optimal 3%optimal 3% 299 BF16 $1.38
Kimi K3 2800.0B (104.0B active) ——16× GPUs 64 4-bit, 16× GPUs $103.63
DeepSeek V4-Pro 1600.0B (49.0B active) —16× GPUs8× GPUs 70 FP8, 16× GPUs $94.74
Kimi K2 1000.0B (32.0B active) 32× GPUs16× GPUs8× GPUs 117 FP8, 16× GPUs $56.50
Kimi K2.5 1000.0B (32.0B active) 32× GPUs16× GPUs8× GPUs 117 FP8, 16× GPUs $56.50
GLM-5 744B 744.0B (40.0B active) 16× GPUs8× GPUs4× GPUs 77 FP8, 8× GPUs $42.95
GLM-5.1 744B 744.0B (40.0B active) 16× GPUs8× GPUs4× GPUs 77 FP8, 8× GPUs $42.95
DeepSeek R1 671.0B (37.0B active) 16× GPUs8× GPUs4× GPUs 80 FP8, 8× GPUs $41.29
DeepSeek R1-0528 671.0B (37.0B active) 16× GPUs8× GPUs4× GPUs 80 FP8, 8× GPUs $41.29
DeepSeek V3 671.0B (37.0B active) 16× GPUs8× GPUs4× GPUs 80 FP8, 8× GPUs $41.29
DeepSeek V3-0324 671.0B (37.0B active) 16× GPUs8× GPUs4× GPUs 80 FP8, 8× GPUs $41.29
DeepSeek V3.2 671.0B (37.0B active) 16× GPUs8× GPUs4× GPUs 80 FP8, 8× GPUs $41.29
MiniMax-M1 456.0B (45.9B active) 16× GPUs8× GPUs4× GPUs 72 FP8, 8× GPUs $45.99
MiniMax-Text-01 456.0B (45.9B active) 16× GPUs8× GPUs4× GPUs 72 FP8, 8× GPUs $45.99
LLaMA 3.1 405B 405.0B 8× GPUs4× GPUs2× GPUs 19 FP8, 4× GPUs $87.60
Llama 4 Maverick (400B) 400.0B (17.0B active) 8× GPUs4× GPUs2× GPUs 97 FP8, 4× GPUs $17.09
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 397.0B (17.0B active) 8× GPUs4× GPUs2× GPUs 145 FP8, 4× GPUs $11.39
Nemotron-4 340B 4K ctx 340.0B 8× GPUs4× GPUs2× GPUs 22 FP8, 4× GPUs $74.24
MiMo V2-Flash 309.8B (15.0B active) 8× GPUs4× GPUs2× GPUs 145 FP8, 4× GPUs $11.44
DeepSeek V4-Flash 284.0B (13.0B active) 8× GPUs4× GPUs2× GPUs 142 FP8, 4× GPUs $11.63
Llama-3.3-Nemotron Ultra 253B 253.0B 4× GPUs4× GPUs2× GPUs 29 FP8, 4× GPUs $56.50
Falcon 40B 40.0B ——— — —
Falcon 7B 7.0B ——— — —

Frequently asked questions

What is the largest LLM that fits on a single GH200 NVL32?

At 8K context and batch 1, the largest models in our catalog that fit on a GH200 NVL32 (141 GB) are: Nemotron-H 56B Base (56B) at BF16; Devstral 2 123B (123B) at FP8; DeepSeek Coder V2 (236B) at 4-bit (AWQ). Larger models need tensor parallelism across several GPUs or lower-precision weights.

Can a GH200 NVL32 run LLaMA 3.3 70B?

at BF16: needs 2× GH200 NVL32; at FP8: fits on one GH200 NVL32 (55% of VRAM, ~37 tok/s); at 4-bit (AWQ): fits on one GH200 NVL32 (33% of VRAM, ~67 tok/s). 8K context, batch 1, vLLM — the calculator sizes other contexts and concurrency.

Can a GH200 NVL32 serve DeepSeek R1?

at BF16: needs 16× GH200 NVL32; at FP8: needs 8× GH200 NVL32; at 4-bit (AWQ): needs 4× GH200 NVL32. 8K context, batch 1, vLLM — the calculator sizes other contexts and concurrency.

How fast is a GH200 NVL32 for LLM inference?

Single-stream decode for LLaMA 3.1 8B at FP8 is about 174 tokens/s on one GH200 NVL32; decode is bound by memory bandwidth (4900 GB/s), so larger models run proportionally slower. Batching raises total throughput far above the single-stream figure.

How much does it cost to rent a GH200 NVL32?

For on-demand rental our catalog estimate is $1.49/hr. The $/1M tokens column above uses that price.

Methodology: every cell comes from the same engine as our GPU Lookup — weights, KV cache (including MLA latent and hybrid / sliding-window layers), activations and framework overhead per model architecture, decode speed from a calibrated memory-bandwidth roofline. Reference scenario: 8K context (4K for models with a shorter native window), batch 1, vLLM, fp16 KV cache. Fit bands: optimal 50–70% of VRAM, good 70–80%, tight 80–95%. Engineering estimates, not a guarantee — validate against your serving framework before buying hardware.