howmanygpus.ai

Best LLMs to run on GH200 96GB

datacenter 96 GB HBM3 · 4000 GB/s · 990 TFLOPS BF16 · updated 2026-10-23

Headline answer

Of 141 models in our catalog, 106 fit on a single GH200 96GB at FP8, 115 at 4-bit (AWQ) and 92 at BF16 (8K context, batch 1). Largest that fits: Command R 35B at BF16; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B at FP8; Mixtral 8x22B at 4-bit (AWQ). Rental: $1.99/hr catalog estimate.

Change context, concurrency or framework in the calculator → GH200 96GB full specs

Every model on GH200 96GB

Fit band and share of VRAM per precision; N× GPUs = minimum count inside one node (tensor parallel); — = does not fit within one 8-GPU node. Speed and $/1M tokens for the highest-quality precision that fits on one GPU (BF16, else FP8, else 4-bit), single stream.

Model Params BF16FP84-bit (AWQ) tok/s $ / 1M tok
Mixtral 8x22B 141.0B (39.0B active) ——tight 83% 89 4-bit $6.19
DBRX 132B 132.0B (36.0B active) ——good 79% 95 4-bit $5.83
Devstral 2 123B 123.0B ——good 79% 35 4-bit $15.88
Mistral Large 2 123B 123.0B ——good 75% 35 4-bit $15.88
Nemotron-3 Super 120B-A12B 120.0B (12.0B active) ——good 71% 181 4-bit $3.05
Mistral Small 4 119B 119.0B (11.0B active) ——good 71% 189 4-bit $2.93
GPT OSS 120B 117.0B (5.1B active) ——good 70% 245 4-bit $2.26
Llama 4 Scout (109B) 109.0B (17.0B active) ——optimal 68% 151 4-bit $3.65
Command R+ 104B 104.0B ——good 73% 40 4-bit $13.68
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B 80.0B (3.0B active) —tight 90%optimal 49% 234 FP8 $2.37
Qwen 2 72B 72.0B —tight 84%optimal 50% 30 FP8 $18.30
Qwen 2.5 72B 72.0B —tight 84%optimal 50% 30 FP8 $18.30
CodeLlama 70B 70.0B —tight 81%optimal 46% 31 FP8 $17.83
DeepSeek R1 Distill 70B 70.0B —tight 81%optimal 48% 31 FP8 $17.83
LLaMA 2 70B 4K ctx 70.0B —tight 80%optimal 44% 31 FP8 $17.83
LLaMA 3.1 70B 70.0B —tight 81%optimal 48% 31 FP8 $17.83
LLaMA 3.3 70B 70.0B —tight 81%optimal 48% 31 FP8 $17.83
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B 70.0B —tight 81%optimal 48% 31 FP8 $17.83
Nemotron-H 56B Base 56.0B —optimal 68%optimal 42% 38 FP8 $14.62
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-51B 51.0B —optimal 60%optimal 37% 41 FP8 $13.45
Llama-3.3-Nemotron Super 49B 49.0B —optimal 58%optimal 36% 43 FP8 $12.98
Kimi Linear 48B-A3B 48.0B (3.0B active) —optimal 56%optimal 32% 235 FP8 $2.36
Mixtral 8x7B 46.7B (12.9B active) —optimal 55%optimal 31% 119 FP8 $4.65
Command R 35B 35.0B tight 88%optimal 53%optimal 41% 31 BF16 $18.01
Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 35.0B (3.0B active) good 78%optimal 42%optimal 26% 181 BF16 $3.05
CodeLlama 34B 34.0B good 77%optimal 42%optimal 25% 32 BF16 $17.33
Yi-1.5 34B 4K ctx 34.0B good 76%optimal 41%optimal 25% 32 BF16 $17.38
DeepSeek R1 Distill 32B 32.0B good 73%optimal 40%optimal 26% 34 BF16 $16.45
Nemotron-Terminal-32B 32.0B good 73%optimal 40%optimal 26% 34 BF16 $16.45
OLMo-2 32B 4K ctx 32.0B good 72%optimal 39%optimal 24% 34 BF16 $16.45
Qwen 2.5 32B 32.0B good 73%optimal 40%optimal 26% 34 BF16 $16.45
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B 32.0B good 73%optimal 40%optimal 26% 34 BF16 $16.45
Qwen3 32B 32.0B good 73%optimal 40%optimal 26% 34 BF16 $16.45
Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B 31.6B (3.2B active) good 70%optimal 38%optimal 22% 176 BF16 $3.13
Muse Glimmer 30B 30.0B optimal 67%optimal 37%optimal 24% 36 BF16 $15.48
Qwen3 30B-A3B 30.0B (3.0B active) optimal 68%optimal 37%optimal 22% 181 BF16 $3.06
Gemma 2 27B 27.0B optimal 64%optimal 36%optimal 26% 39 BF16 $14.17
Gemma 3 27B 27.0B optimal 65%optimal 37%optimal 28% 39 BF16 $14.17
Qwen3.6 27B 27.0B optimal 63%optimal 35%optimal 25% 39 BF16 $14.14
Devstral 24B 24.0B optimal 56%optimal 31%optimal 21% 43 BF16 $12.74
Devstral Small 2 24B 24.0B optimal 56%optimal 31%optimal 21% 43 BF16 $12.74
Magistral Small 24B 24.0B optimal 56%optimal 31%optimal 21% 43 BF16 $12.74
Mistral Small 3.1 24B 24.0B optimal 56%optimal 31%optimal 21% 43 BF16 $12.74
Codestral 22B 22.0B optimal 52%optimal 30%optimal 19% 47 BF16 $11.84
GPT OSS 20B 21.0B (3.6B active) optimal 48%optimal 27%optimal 18% 166 BF16 $3.33
InternLM 2.5 20B 20.0B optimal 48%optimal 27%optimal 18% 51 BF16 $10.90
DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite 16.0B (2.4B active) optimal 38%optimal 22%optimal 14% 200 BF16 $2.77
StarCoder2 15B 16.0B optimal 38%optimal 22%optimal 14% 61 BF16 $9.02
DeepSeek R1 Distill 14B 14.8B optimal 37%optimal 22%optimal 16% 65 BF16 $8.49
Qwen 2.5 14B 14.8B optimal 37%optimal 22%optimal 16% 65 BF16 $8.49
Qwen3 14B 14.8B optimal 36%optimal 21%optimal 16% 65 BF16 $8.49
Phi 3 Medium 14.0B optimal 35%optimal 21%optimal 14% 68 BF16 $8.14
Phi-4 14B 14.0B optimal 35%optimal 21%optimal 15% 68 BF16 $8.14
Qwen 2.5 Coder 14B 14.0B optimal 35%optimal 21%optimal 16% 68 BF16 $8.14
OLMo-2 13B 4K ctx 13.7B optimal 36%optimal 22%optimal 17% 68 BF16 $8.13
LLaMA 2 13B 4K ctx 13.0B optimal 35%optimal 22%optimal 15% 71 BF16 $7.80
Gemma 3 12B 12.0B optimal 33%optimal 20%optimal 17% 76 BF16 $7.25
Mistral Nemo 12B 12.0B optimal 31%optimal 18%optimal 14% 77 BF16 $7.22
Nemotron-Nano-12B-v2 12.0B optimal 31%optimal 19%optimal 15% 76 BF16 $7.24
StableLM 2 12B 4K ctx 12.0B optimal 30%optimal 18%optimal 13% 76 BF16 $7.23
Falcon3 10B 10.0B optimal 26%optimal 16%optimal 12% 88 BF16 $6.30
GLM-4 9B 9.0B optimal 23%optimal 14%optimal 11% 95 BF16 $5.81
Gemma 2 9B 9.0B optimal 26%optimal 17%optimal 15% 94 BF16 $5.87
Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 9.0B optimal 25%optimal 16%optimal 13% 95 BF16 $5.84
Yi-1.5 9B 4K ctx 9.0B optimal 23%optimal 14%optimal 10% 95 BF16 $5.82
InternLM3 8B 8.8B optimal 23%optimal 14%optimal 11% 97 BF16 $5.72
Qwen3-VL 8B 8.8B optimal 24%optimal 15%optimal 12% 97 BF16 $5.72
MiniCPM-V 4.5 8.7B optimal 24%optimal 15%optimal 12% 97 BF16 $5.69
Ministral-3 8B 8.5B optimal 23%optimal 14%optimal 12% 99 BF16 $5.60
Qwen2.5-VL 7B 8.3B optimal 22%optimal 14%optimal 11% 101 BF16 $5.49
DeepSeek R1 Distill 8B 8.0B optimal 22%optimal 14%optimal 11% 103 BF16 $5.37
Granite 3.3 8B 8.0B optimal 22%optimal 14%optimal 11% 103 BF16 $5.37
LLaMA 3.1 8B 8.0B optimal 22%optimal 14%optimal 11% 103 BF16 $5.37
Ministral 8B 8.0B optimal 22%optimal 14%optimal 12% 103 BF16 $5.37
Qwen3 8B 8.0B optimal 22%optimal 14%optimal 12% 103 BF16 $5.37
Qwen 2.5 7B 7.6B optimal 21%optimal 13%optimal 10% 107 BF16 $5.18
Falcon3 7B 7.5B optimal 21%optimal 13%optimal 10% 108 BF16 $5.11
Phi-3 Small 7B 7.4B optimal 21%optimal 13%optimal 11% 109 BF16 $5.09
InternLM 2.5 7B 7.0B optimal 20%optimal 13%optimal 10% 113 BF16 $4.90
LLaMA 2 7B 4K ctx 7.0B optimal 21%optimal 14%optimal 11% 111 BF16 $4.98
Mistral 7B 7.0B optimal 20%optimal 13%optimal 10% 113 BF16 $4.90
OLMo-2 7B 4K ctx 7.0B optimal 21%optimal 14%optimal 12% 111 BF16 $4.98
Qwen 2 7B 7.0B optimal 19%optimal 12%optimal 10% 113 BF16 $4.89
Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B 7.0B optimal 19%optimal 12%optimal 10% 113 BF16 $4.89
StarCoder2 7B 7.0B optimal 19%optimal 12%optimal 9% 113 BF16 $4.90
Yi-1.5 6B 4K ctx 6.0B optimal 17%optimal 11%optimal 9% 125 BF16 $4.43
Qwen3-VL 4B 4.4B optimal 15%optimal 10%optimal 9% 148 BF16 $3.73
Gemma 3 4B 4.3B optimal 14%optimal 10%optimal 10% 151 BF16 $3.66
Nemotron-Mini-4B 4K ctx 4.0B optimal 13%optimal 9%optimal 9% 157 BF16 $3.52
Qwen3 4B 4.0B optimal 14%optimal 10%optimal 9% 157 BF16 $3.53
Ministral 3B 3.8B optimal 13%optimal 9%optimal 8% 162 BF16 $3.42
Phi 3.5 Mini 3.8B optimal 16%optimal 12%optimal 10% 159 BF16 $3.48
Phi-4 Mini 3.8B optimal 13%optimal 9%optimal 9% 161 BF16 $3.43
Qwen2.5-VL 3B 3.8B optimal 12%optimal 8%optimal 8% 163 BF16 $3.39
Ministral-3 3B 3.4B optimal 12%optimal 9%optimal 8% 170 BF16 $3.24
LLaMA 3.2 3B 3.2B optimal 12%optimal 9%optimal 8% 175 BF16 $3.16
Falcon3 3B 3.0B optimal 11%optimal 8%optimal 8% 181 BF16 $3.06
Qwen 2.5 3B 3.0B optimal 11%optimal 8%optimal 7% 181 BF16 $3.05
Qwen 2.5 Coder 3B 3.0B optimal 11%optimal 8%optimal 7% 181 BF16 $3.05
StarCoder2 3B 3.0B optimal 11%optimal 8%optimal 7% 182 BF16 $3.05
Qwen3-VL 2B 2.1B optimal 10%optimal 8%optimal 7% 208 BF16 $2.66
Granite 3.1 2B 2.0B optimal 9%optimal 7%optimal 6% 213 BF16 $2.59
Qwen3 1.7B 1.7B optimal 9%optimal 7%optimal 7% 224 BF16 $2.46
SmolLM2 1.7B 1.7B optimal 10%optimal 8%optimal 7% 223 BF16 $2.48
StableLM 2 1.6B 4K ctx 1.6B optimal 8%optimal 7%optimal 7% 228 BF16 $2.43
Qwen 2 1.5B 1.5B optimal 8%optimal 6%optimal 6% 235 BF16 $2.35
Qwen 2.5 1.5B 1.5B optimal 8%optimal 6%optimal 6% 235 BF16 $2.35
Qwen 2.5 Coder 1.5B 1.5B optimal 8%optimal 6%optimal 6% 235 BF16 $2.35
LLaMA 3.2 1B 1.2B optimal 7%optimal 6%optimal 6% 247 BF16 $2.24
Falcon3 1B 4K ctx 1.0B optimal 7%optimal 6%optimal 6% 259 BF16 $2.13
Gemma 3 1B 1.0B optimal 7%optimal 6%optimal 6% 260 BF16 $2.12
Qwen3 0.6B 0.6B optimal 6%optimal 6%optimal 6% 283 BF16 $1.96
Qwen 2 0.5B 0.5B optimal 5%optimal 5%optimal 5% 292 BF16 $1.89
Qwen 2.5 0.5B 0.5B optimal 5%optimal 5%optimal 5% 292 BF16 $1.89
Qwen 2.5 Coder 0.5B 0.5B optimal 5%optimal 5%optimal 5% 292 BF16 $1.89
Kimi K3 2800.0B (104.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V4-Pro 1600.0B (49.0B active) ——— — —
Kimi K2 1000.0B (32.0B active) ——— — —
Kimi K2.5 1000.0B (32.0B active) ——— — —
GLM-5 744B 744.0B (40.0B active) ——— — —
GLM-5.1 744B 744.0B (40.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek R1 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek R1-0528 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3-0324 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3.2 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax-M1 456.0B (45.9B active) ——— — —
MiniMax-Text-01 456.0B (45.9B active) ——— — —
LLaMA 3.1 405B 405.0B ——— — —
Llama 4 Maverick (400B) 400.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 397.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Nemotron-4 340B 340.0B ——— — —
MiMo V2-Flash 309.8B (15.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V4-Flash 284.0B (13.0B active) ——— — —
Llama-3.3-Nemotron Ultra 253B 253.0B ——— — —
DeepSeek Coder V2 236.0B (21.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen3 235B-A22B 235.0B (22.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax M2.5 230.0B (10.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax M2.7 230.0B (10.0B active) ——— — —
Falcon 40B 40.0B ——— — —
Falcon 7B 7.0B ——— — —

Frequently asked questions

What is the largest LLM that fits on a single GH200 96GB?

At 8K context and batch 1, the largest models in our catalog that fit on a GH200 96GB (96 GB) are: Command R 35B (35B) at BF16; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (80B) at FP8; Mixtral 8x22B (141B) at 4-bit (AWQ). Larger models need tensor parallelism across several GPUs or lower-precision weights.

Can a GH200 96GB run LLaMA 3.3 70B?

at BF16: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at FP8: fits on one GH200 96GB (81% of VRAM, ~31 tok/s); at 4-bit (AWQ): fits on one GH200 96GB (48% of VRAM, ~56 tok/s). 8K context, batch 1, vLLM — the calculator sizes other contexts and concurrency.

Can a GH200 96GB serve DeepSeek R1?

at BF16: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at FP8: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at 4-bit (AWQ): does not fit within one 8-GPU node. 8K context, batch 1, vLLM — the calculator sizes other contexts and concurrency.

How fast is a GH200 96GB for LLM inference?

Single-stream decode for LLaMA 3.1 8B at FP8 is about 157 tokens/s on one GH200 96GB; decode is bound by memory bandwidth (4000 GB/s), so larger models run proportionally slower. Batching raises total throughput far above the single-stream figure.

How much does it cost to rent a GH200 96GB?

For on-demand rental our catalog estimate is $1.99/hr. The $/1M tokens column above uses that price.

Methodology: every cell comes from the same engine as our GPU Lookup — weights, KV cache (including MLA latent and hybrid / sliding-window layers), activations and framework overhead per model architecture, decode speed from a calibrated memory-bandwidth roofline. Reference scenario: 8K context (4K for models with a shorter native window), batch 1, vLLM, fp16 KV cache. Fit bands: optimal 50–70% of VRAM, good 70–80%, tight 80–95%. Engineering estimates, not a guarantee — validate against your serving framework before buying hardware.