howmanygpus.ai

Best LLMs to run on DGX Spark 128GB

prosumer 128 GB LPDDR5X · 273 GB/s · 125 TFLOPS BF16 · updated 2026-10-23

Headline answer

Of 141 models in our catalog, 108 fit on a single DGX Spark 128GB at FP8, 115 at 4-bit (AWQ) and 97 at BF16 (8K context, batch 1). Largest that fits: Nemotron-H 56B Base at BF16; Llama 4 Scout (109B) at FP8; Mixtral 8x22B at 4-bit (AWQ).

Change context, concurrency or framework in the calculator → DGX Spark 128GB full specs

Every model on DGX Spark 128GB

Fit band and share of VRAM per precision; N× GPUs = minimum count inside one node (tensor parallel); — = does not fit within one 8-GPU node. Speed and $/1M tokens for the highest-quality precision that fits on one GPU (BF16, else FP8, else 4-bit), single stream.

Model Params BF16FP84-bit (AWQ) tok/s $ / 1M tok
Mixtral 8x22B 141.0B (39.0B active) ——optimal 62% 8 4-bit —
DBRX 132B 132.0B (36.0B active) ——optimal 59% 9 4-bit —
Devstral 2 123B 123.0B ——optimal 59% 3 4-bit —
Mistral Large 2 123B 123.0B ——optimal 56% 3 4-bit —
Nemotron-3 Super 120B-A12B 120.0B (12.0B active) ——optimal 54% 25 4-bit —
Mistral Small 4 119B 119.0B (11.0B active) ——optimal 53% 27 4-bit —
GPT OSS 120B 117.0B (5.1B active) ——optimal 52% 53 4-bit —
Llama 4 Scout (109B) 109.0B (17.0B active) —tight 91%optimal 51% 9 FP8 —
Command R+ 104B 104.0B —tight 88%optimal 54% 2 FP8 —
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B 80.0B (3.0B active) —optimal 68%optimal 37% 46 FP8 —
Qwen 2 72B 72.0B —optimal 63%optimal 37% 2 FP8 —
Qwen 2.5 72B 72.0B —optimal 63%optimal 37% 2 FP8 —
CodeLlama 70B 70.0B —optimal 61%optimal 34% 2 FP8 —
DeepSeek R1 Distill 70B 70.0B —optimal 61%optimal 36% 2 FP8 —
LLaMA 2 70B 4K ctx 70.0B —optimal 60%optimal 33% 2 FP8 —
LLaMA 3.1 70B 70.0B —optimal 61%optimal 36% 2 FP8 —
LLaMA 3.3 70B 70.0B —optimal 61%optimal 36% 2 FP8 —
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B 70.0B —optimal 61%optimal 36% 2 FP8 —
Nemotron-H 56B Base 56.0B tight 94%optimal 51%optimal 32% 2 BF16 —
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-51B 51.0B tight 84%optimal 45%optimal 28% 2 BF16 —
Llama-3.3-Nemotron Super 49B 49.0B tight 81%optimal 44%optimal 27% 2 BF16 —
Kimi Linear 48B-A3B 48.0B (3.0B active) good 78%optimal 42%optimal 24% 25 BF16 —
Mixtral 8x7B 46.7B (12.9B active) good 77%optimal 41%optimal 23% 6 BF16 —
Command R 35B 35.0B optimal 66%optimal 40%optimal 31% 2 BF16 —
Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 35.0B (3.0B active) optimal 58%optimal 32%optimal 19% 25 BF16 —
CodeLlama 34B 34.0B optimal 58%optimal 32%optimal 19% 2 BF16 —
Yi-1.5 34B 4K ctx 34.0B optimal 57%optimal 31%optimal 19% 2 BF16 —
DeepSeek R1 Distill 32B 32.0B optimal 55%optimal 30%optimal 20% 2 BF16 —
Nemotron-Terminal-32B 32.0B optimal 55%optimal 30%optimal 20% 2 BF16 —
OLMo-2 32B 4K ctx 32.0B optimal 54%optimal 30%optimal 18% 2 BF16 —
Qwen 2.5 32B 32.0B optimal 55%optimal 30%optimal 20% 2 BF16 —
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B 32.0B optimal 55%optimal 30%optimal 20% 2 BF16 —
Qwen3 32B 32.0B optimal 55%optimal 30%optimal 20% 2 BF16 —
Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B 31.6B (3.2B active) optimal 53%optimal 28%optimal 17% 24 BF16 —
Muse Glimmer 30B 30.0B optimal 50%optimal 27%optimal 18% 3 BF16 —
Qwen3 30B-A3B 30.0B (3.0B active) optimal 51%optimal 28%optimal 17% 25 BF16 —
Gemma 2 27B 27.0B optimal 48%optimal 27%optimal 19% 3 BF16 —
Gemma 3 27B 27.0B optimal 49%optimal 28%optimal 21% 3 BF16 —
Qwen3.6 27B 27.0B optimal 47%optimal 26%optimal 19% 3 BF16 —
Devstral 24B 24.0B optimal 42%optimal 23%optimal 16% 3 BF16 —
Devstral Small 2 24B 24.0B optimal 42%optimal 23%optimal 16% 3 BF16 —
Magistral Small 24B 24.0B optimal 42%optimal 23%optimal 16% 3 BF16 —
Mistral Small 3.1 24B 24.0B optimal 42%optimal 23%optimal 16% 3 BF16 —
Codestral 22B 22.0B optimal 39%optimal 22%optimal 14% 4 BF16 —
GPT OSS 20B 21.0B (3.6B active) optimal 36%optimal 20%optimal 13% 21 BF16 —
InternLM 2.5 20B 20.0B optimal 36%optimal 20%optimal 14% 4 BF16 —
DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite 16.0B (2.4B active) optimal 28%optimal 16%optimal 10% 31 BF16 —
StarCoder2 15B 16.0B optimal 29%optimal 16%optimal 11% 5 BF16 —
DeepSeek R1 Distill 14B 14.8B optimal 28%optimal 16%optimal 12% 5 BF16 —
Qwen 2.5 14B 14.8B optimal 28%optimal 16%optimal 12% 5 BF16 —
Qwen3 14B 14.8B optimal 27%optimal 16%optimal 12% 5 BF16 —
Phi 3 Medium 14.0B optimal 26%optimal 16%optimal 11% 6 BF16 —
Phi-4 14B 14.0B optimal 26%optimal 16%optimal 11% 6 BF16 —
Qwen 2.5 Coder 14B 14.0B optimal 26%optimal 16%optimal 12% 6 BF16 —
OLMo-2 13B 4K ctx 13.7B optimal 27%optimal 17%optimal 13% 6 BF16 —
LLaMA 2 13B 4K ctx 13.0B optimal 26%optimal 16%optimal 12% 6 BF16 —
Gemma 3 12B 12.0B optimal 24%optimal 15%optimal 13% 7 BF16 —
Mistral Nemo 12B 12.0B optimal 23%optimal 14%optimal 11% 7 BF16 —
Nemotron-Nano-12B-v2 12.0B optimal 24%optimal 14%optimal 11% 7 BF16 —
StableLM 2 12B 4K ctx 12.0B optimal 23%optimal 13%optimal 10% 7 BF16 —
Falcon3 10B 10.0B optimal 20%optimal 12%optimal 9% 8 BF16 —
GLM-4 9B 9.0B optimal 18%optimal 11%optimal 8% 9 BF16 —
Gemma 2 9B 9.0B optimal 19%optimal 13%optimal 11% 9 BF16 —
Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 9.0B optimal 19%optimal 12%optimal 10% 9 BF16 —
Yi-1.5 9B 4K ctx 9.0B optimal 18%optimal 11%optimal 8% 9 BF16 —
InternLM3 8B 8.8B optimal 17%optimal 10%optimal 8% 9 BF16 —
Qwen3-VL 8B 8.8B optimal 18%optimal 11%optimal 9% 9 BF16 —
MiniCPM-V 4.5 8.7B optimal 18%optimal 11%optimal 9% 9 BF16 —
Ministral-3 8B 8.5B optimal 17%optimal 11%optimal 9% 9 BF16 —
Qwen2.5-VL 7B 8.3B optimal 16%optimal 10%optimal 8% 10 BF16 —
DeepSeek R1 Distill 8B 8.0B optimal 16%optimal 10%optimal 8% 10 BF16 —
Granite 3.3 8B 8.0B optimal 17%optimal 11%optimal 8% 10 BF16 —
LLaMA 3.1 8B 8.0B optimal 16%optimal 10%optimal 8% 10 BF16 —
Ministral 8B 8.0B optimal 17%optimal 10%optimal 9% 10 BF16 —
Qwen3 8B 8.0B optimal 17%optimal 10%optimal 9% 10 BF16 —
Qwen 2.5 7B 7.6B optimal 16%optimal 10%optimal 8% 10 BF16 —
Falcon3 7B 7.5B optimal 16%optimal 10%optimal 8% 11 BF16 —
Phi-3 Small 7B 7.4B optimal 16%optimal 10%optimal 8% 11 BF16 —
InternLM 2.5 7B 7.0B optimal 15%optimal 10%optimal 8% 11 BF16 —
LLaMA 2 7B 4K ctx 7.0B optimal 16%optimal 10%optimal 8% 11 BF16 —
Mistral 7B 7.0B optimal 15%optimal 10%optimal 7% 11 BF16 —
OLMo-2 7B 4K ctx 7.0B optimal 16%optimal 10%optimal 9% 11 BF16 —
Qwen 2 7B 7.0B optimal 14%optimal 9%optimal 8% 11 BF16 —
Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B 7.0B optimal 14%optimal 9%optimal 8% 11 BF16 —
StarCoder2 7B 7.0B optimal 14%optimal 9%optimal 7% 11 BF16 —
Yi-1.5 6B 4K ctx 6.0B optimal 13%optimal 8%optimal 6% 13 BF16 —
Qwen3-VL 4B 4.4B optimal 11%optimal 8%optimal 7% 17 BF16 —
Gemma 3 4B 4.3B optimal 11%optimal 8%optimal 7% 18 BF16 —
Nemotron-Mini-4B 4K ctx 4.0B optimal 10%optimal 7%optimal 7% 19 BF16 —
Qwen3 4B 4.0B optimal 10%optimal 7%optimal 7% 19 BF16 —
Ministral 3B 3.8B optimal 10%optimal 7%optimal 6% 20 BF16 —
Phi 3.5 Mini 3.8B optimal 12%optimal 9%optimal 8% 20 BF16 —
Phi-4 Mini 3.8B optimal 10%optimal 7%optimal 7% 20 BF16 —
Qwen2.5-VL 3B 3.8B optimal 9%optimal 6%optimal 6% 20 BF16 —
Ministral-3 3B 3.4B optimal 9%optimal 7%optimal 6% 22 BF16 —
LLaMA 3.2 3B 3.2B optimal 9%optimal 6%optimal 6% 23 BF16 —
Falcon3 3B 3.0B optimal 8%optimal 6%optimal 6% 25 BF16 —
Qwen 2.5 3B 3.0B optimal 8%optimal 6%optimal 5% 25 BF16 —
Qwen 2.5 Coder 3B 3.0B optimal 8%optimal 6%optimal 5% 25 BF16 —
StarCoder2 3B 3.0B optimal 8%optimal 6%optimal 5% 25 BF16 —
Qwen3-VL 2B 2.1B optimal 7%optimal 6%optimal 6% 34 BF16 —
Granite 3.1 2B 2.0B optimal 7%optimal 5%optimal 5% 36 BF16 —
Qwen3 1.7B 1.7B optimal 7%optimal 5%optimal 5% 41 BF16 —
SmolLM2 1.7B 1.7B optimal 7%optimal 6%optimal 5% 40 BF16 —
StableLM 2 1.6B 4K ctx 1.6B optimal 6%optimal 5%optimal 5% 43 BF16 —
Qwen 2 1.5B 1.5B optimal 6%optimal 5%optimal 4% 47 BF16 —
Qwen 2.5 1.5B 1.5B optimal 6%optimal 5%optimal 4% 47 BF16 —
Qwen 2.5 Coder 1.5B 1.5B optimal 6%optimal 5%optimal 4% 47 BF16 —
LLaMA 3.2 1B 1.2B optimal 5%optimal 4%optimal 4% 55 BF16 —
Falcon3 1B 4K ctx 1.0B optimal 5%optimal 4%optimal 4% 64 BF16 —
Gemma 3 1B 1.0B optimal 5%optimal 4%optimal 4% 65 BF16 —
Qwen3 0.6B 0.6B optimal 5%optimal 4%optimal 4% 92 BF16 —
Qwen 2 0.5B 0.5B optimal 4%optimal 4%optimal 4% 109 BF16 —
Qwen 2.5 0.5B 0.5B optimal 4%optimal 4%optimal 4% 109 BF16 —
Qwen 2.5 Coder 0.5B 0.5B optimal 4%optimal 4%optimal 4% 109 BF16 —
Kimi K3 2800.0B (104.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V4-Pro 1600.0B (49.0B active) ——— — —
Kimi K2 1000.0B (32.0B active) ——— — —
Kimi K2.5 1000.0B (32.0B active) ——— — —
GLM-5 744B 744.0B (40.0B active) ——— — —
GLM-5.1 744B 744.0B (40.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek R1 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek R1-0528 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3-0324 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V3.2 671.0B (37.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax-M1 456.0B (45.9B active) ——— — —
MiniMax-Text-01 456.0B (45.9B active) ——— — —
LLaMA 3.1 405B 405.0B ——— — —
Llama 4 Maverick (400B) 400.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 397.0B (17.0B active) ——— — —
Nemotron-4 340B 340.0B ——— — —
MiMo V2-Flash 309.8B (15.0B active) ——— — —
DeepSeek V4-Flash 284.0B (13.0B active) ——— — —
Llama-3.3-Nemotron Ultra 253B 253.0B ——— — —
DeepSeek Coder V2 236.0B (21.0B active) ——— — —
Qwen3 235B-A22B 235.0B (22.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax M2.5 230.0B (10.0B active) ——— — —
MiniMax M2.7 230.0B (10.0B active) ——— — —
Falcon 40B 40.0B ——— — —
Falcon 7B 7.0B ——— — —

Frequently asked questions

What is the largest LLM that fits on a single DGX Spark 128GB?

At 8K context and batch 1, the largest models in our catalog that fit on a DGX Spark 128GB (128 GB) are: Nemotron-H 56B Base (56B) at BF16; Llama 4 Scout (109B) (109B) at FP8; Mixtral 8x22B (141B) at 4-bit (AWQ). Larger models need tensor parallelism across several GPUs or lower-precision weights.

Can a DGX Spark 128GB run LLaMA 3.3 70B?

at BF16: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at FP8: fits on one DGX Spark 128GB (61% of VRAM, ~2 tok/s); at 4-bit (AWQ): fits on one DGX Spark 128GB (36% of VRAM, ~5 tok/s). 8K context, batch 1, vLLM — the calculator sizes other contexts and concurrency.

Can a DGX Spark 128GB serve DeepSeek R1?

at BF16: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at FP8: does not fit within one 8-GPU node; at 4-bit (AWQ): does not fit within one 8-GPU node. 8K context, batch 1, vLLM — the calculator sizes other contexts and concurrency.

How fast is a DGX Spark 128GB for LLM inference?

Single-stream decode for LLaMA 3.1 8B at FP8 is about 19 tokens/s on one DGX Spark 128GB; decode is bound by memory bandwidth (273 GB/s), so larger models run proportionally slower. Batching raises total throughput far above the single-stream figure.

Methodology: every cell comes from the same engine as our GPU Lookup — weights, KV cache (including MLA latent and hybrid / sliding-window layers), activations and framework overhead per model architecture, decode speed from a calibrated memory-bandwidth roofline. Reference scenario: 8K context (4K for models with a shorter native window), batch 1, vLLM, fp16 KV cache. Fit bands: optimal 50–70% of VRAM, good 70–80%, tight 80–95%. Engineering estimates, not a guarantee — validate against your serving framework before buying hardware.